Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Regression Models for Filling Temporal Gaps of Meteorological Variables Time Series
-
Published:2023-02-18
Issue:4
Volume:13
Page:2646
-
ISSN:2076-3417
-
Container-title:Applied Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Applied Sciences
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Monitoring of Climatic and Ecological System SB RAS, Tomsk 634055, Russia 2. Laboratory of ecosystem-atmosphere interactions in forest-bog complexes, Yugra State University, Khanty-Mansiysk 628012, Russia 3. A. M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Moscow 119017, Russia
Abstract
Continuous meteorological variable time series are highly demanded for various climate related studies. Five statistical models were tested for application of temporal gaps filling in time series of surface air pressure, air temperature, relative air humidity, incoming solar radiation, net radiation, and soil temperature. A bilayer artificial neural network, linear regression, linear regression with interactions, and the Gaussian process regression models with exponential and rational quadratic kernel were used to fill the gaps. Models were driven by continuous time series of meteorological variables from the ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts) ERA5-Land reanalysis. Raw ECMWF ERA5-Land reanalysis data are not applicable for characterization of specific local weather conditions. The linear correlation coefficients (CC) between ERA5-Land data and in situ observations vary from 0.61 (for wind direction) to 0.99 (for atmospheric pressure). The mean difference is high and estimated at 3.2 °C for air temperature and 3.5 hPa for atmospheric pressure. The normalized root-mean-square error (NRMSE) is 5–13%, except for wind direction (NRMSE = 49%). The linear bias correction of ERA5-Land data improves matching between the local and reanalysis data for all meteorological variables. The Gaussian process regression model with an exponential kernel based or bilayered artificial neural network trained on ERA5-Land data significantly shifts raw ERA5-Land data toward the observed values. The NRMSE values reduce to 2–11% for all variables, except wind direction (NRMSE = 22%). CC for the model is above 0.87, except for wind characteristics. The suggested model calibrated against in situ observations can be applied for gap-filling of time series of meteorological variables.
Funder
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation Tyumen region Government Russian Scientific Foundation
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference61 articles.
1. Masson-Delmotte, V.P., Zhai, A., Pirani, S.L., Connors, C., Péan, S., Berger, N., Caud, Y., Chen, L., Goldfarb, M.I., and Gomis, M. (2021). Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press. 2. Climate change scenario services: From science to facilitating action;Auer;One Earth,2021 3. What data analytics can or cannot do for climate change studies: An inventory of interactive visual tools;Bhardwaj;Ecol. Inform.,2023 4. Kharyutkina, E., Loginov, S., Martynova, Y.V., and Sudakov, I. (2022). Time series analysis of atmospheric precipitation characteristics in Western Siberia for 1979–2018 across different datasets. Atmosphere, 13. 5. Perception of climate change;Hansen;Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,2012
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Interpolation of environmental data using deep learning and model inference;Machine Learning: Science and Technology;2024-05-23 2. Preprocessing Techniques of Solar Irradiation Data;2023 IEEE Renewable Energy and Sustainable E-Mobility Conference (RESEM);2023-05-17
|
|