Affiliation:
1. Department of Information and Electronic Engineering, International Hellenic University (IHU), 57400 Thessaloniki, Greece
2. School of Philosophy and Education, Department of Education, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Abstract
The integration of the Arduino board into educational settings has penetrated across various educational levels. The teaching of this subject can be accomplished by (a) using real components in breadboards, (b) prefabricated modular boards that snap together, and (c) utilizing computer simulations. Yet, it is unknown which interface offers a more effective learning experience. Therefore, this experimental study aims to compare the effectiveness of these interfaces in a series of three laboratory exercises involving 110 university students, who were divided into three groups: (a) the first group used a tangible user interface, implementing circuits on breadboards, (b) the second group also used a tangible interface but with modular boards, and (c) the third group used a graphical user interface to simulate circuits using Tinkercad. For each laboratory exercise, students completed both pretests and posttests. Also, they provided feedback through five Likert-type attitude questions regarding their experiences. In terms of data analysis, t-tests, ANOVA, and ANCOVA, along with bootstrapping, and principal component analysis were employed. The results suggest that among the participants, those who used a graphical user interface stated that their understanding of the interconnection of components in microcontroller circuits was enhanced, while students with previous experience in microcontroller labs found the circuit creation process easier than students without experience.
Reference64 articles.
1. Design and Implementation of Electronic Circuit Virtual Laboratory Based on Virtual Reality Technology;Cui;J. Comput. Methods Sci. Eng.,2021
2. The Effect of Virtual Laboratory Simulations on Medical Laboratory Techniques Students’ Knowledge and Vocational Laboratory Education;Bulgurcu;Turk. J. Biochem.,2022
3. Ali, N., Ullah, S., and Khan, D. (2022). Interactive Laboratories for Science Education: A Subjective Study and Systematic Literature Review. Multimodal Technol. Interact., 6.
4. Predictors of Student Engagement in Science Learning: The Role of Science Laboratory Learning Environment and Science Learning Motivation;Haw;Asia Pac. J. Educ. Educ.,2022
5. Tselegkaridis, S., Sapounidis, T., and Stamovlasis, D. (2023). Teaching Electric Circuits Using Tangible and Graphical User Interfaces: A Meta-Analysis. Educ. Inf. Technol., 1–25.