Abstract
Traditional philological methods in Roman legal scholarship such as close reading and strict juristic reasoning have analysed law in extraordinary detail. Such methods, however, have paid less attention to the empirical characteristics of legal texts and occasionally projected an abstract framework onto the sources. The paper presents a series of computer-assisted methods to open new frontiers of inquiry. Using a Python coding environment, we have built a relational database of the Latin text of the Digest, a historical sourcebook of Roman law compiled under the order of Emperor Justinian in 533 CE. Subsequently, we investigated the structure of Roman law by automatically clustering the sections of the Digest according to their linguistic profile. Finally, we explored the characteristics of Roman legal language according to the principles and methods of computational distributional semantics. Our research has discovered an empirical structure of Roman law which arises from the sources themselves and complements the dominant scholarly assumption that Roman law rests on abstract structures. By building and comparing Latin word embeddings models, we were also able to detect a semantic split in words with general and legal sense. These investigations point to a practical focus in Roman law which is consistent with the view that ancient law schools were more interested in training lawyers for practice rather than in philosophical neatness.
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Communication
Reference70 articles.
1. Justinian’s Institutes,1987
2. Ars aequi et boni, legal argumentation and the correct legal solution
3. Summum ius summa iniuria. Ein Kapitel aus der Geschichte der interpretatio iuris;Stroux,1949
4. Summum ius summa iniuria. Vorwort zur italienischen Ausgabe;Riccobono,1926
5. Topik und Jurisprudenz. Ein Beitrag zur Rechtswissenschaftlichen Grundlagenforschung;Viehweg,1953
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献