Affiliation:
1. Department of Food Science & Technology, The Ohio State University, 2015 Fyffe Rd., Columbus, OH 43210, USA
2. Aigora LLC, 2515 Whispering Oaks Ct., Midlothian, VA 23112, USA
Abstract
Utilizing immersive technologies to reintroduce the environmental context (i.e., visual, auditory, and olfactory cues) in sensory testing has been one area of research for improving panelist engagement. The current study sought to understand whether pairing smart-speaker questionnaires in immersive spaces could positively affect the panelist experience through enhanced ecological validity. To this end, subjects performed an immersive consumer test in which responses were collected using a traditional computer-based survey, a smart-speaker approach incorporating a direct translation of the computer questionnaire into a verbal survey requiring numeric responses, and an optimized smart-speaker survey with alternative question formatting requiring spoken word-based responses. After testing, participants answered the Engagement Questionnaire (EQ) to assess participant engagement during the test, and the System Usability Scale (SUS) survey to understand the ease, and potential adoption, of using the various survey technologies in the study. Results indicated that the traditional computer-based survey was the most engaging (p < 0.001) and usable (p < 0.001), with no differences found between the two smart-speaker surveys (p = 0.803 and p = 0.577, respectively). This suggests that the proposed optimizations for the smart-speaker surveys were not robust enough to influence engagement and usability, and further research is needed to enhance their conversational capabilities.
Subject
Plant Science,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science),Microbiology,Food Science
Reference32 articles.
1. Editorial overview: Sensory science and consumer perception;Martini;Curr. Opin. Food Sci.,2018
2. Does environment matter? Assessments of wine in traditional booths compared to an immersive and actual wine bar;Hannum;Food Qual. Prefer.,2019
3. Thinking outside the booth—The eating environment, context and ecological validity in sensory and consumer research;Stelick;Curr. Opin. Food Sci.,2018
4. Lawless, H.T., and Heymann, H. (2010). Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices, Springer.
5. The use of immersive technologies to improve consumer testing: The role of ecological validity, context and engagement in evaluating coffee;Bangcuyo;Food Qual. Prefer.,2015
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献