Author:
Henderson Daniel J.,Souto Anne-Charlotte,Wang Le
Abstract
In the traditional human capital framework, education is often considered as an investment, rather than consumption, while consumption is not necessarily precluded. Whether education is an investment is empirically unclear and relatively under-explored. We shed light on this issue by estimating the risk–return trade-off in the context of education. If education is indeed an investment, risk could play an important role in individual educational decisions just as with risky assets. As portfolio theory predicts, there could be a trade-off between returns to education and risks concerning those returns: higher risks are generally associated with higher returns. We contribute to the literature by proposing various measures of risk based on the entire distribution of returns to education recovered by our nonparametric models. Our results confirm a trade-off between returns and variance. We also found statistically significant impacts for the higher moments: skewness and kurtosis. Interestingly, we found the relationship between mean returns and variance to be linear, and the relationship between expected returns and higher-moments (skewness and kurtosis) is non-linear.
Reference48 articles.
1. How Large Are the Social Returns to Education? Evidence from Compulsory Schooling Laws;Acemoglu,1999
2. Does Compulsory School Attendance Affect Schooling and Earnings?
3. The Effect of Age at School Entry on Educational Attainment: An Application of Instrumental Variables with Moments from Two Samples
4. Risk-return trade-offs to different educational paths: Vocational, academic and mixed;Backes-Gellner;International Journal of Manpower,2010
5. Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis;Bernoulli;Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae,1738
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献