Author:
Tuor Simone N.,Backes‐Gellner Uschi
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the rates of return and the risks of different types of educational paths – all leading to a tertiary educational degree. The paper seeks to distinguish a purely academic educational path from a purely vocational path and a mixed path with loops through both systems.Design/methodology/approachThe paper studies the labor market outcome to compare earnings and calculate net return rates as well as risk measures to investigate whether different educational paths are characterized by different risk‐return trade‐offs. Entrepreneurs are separated from employees in order to examine whether for the same combination of education the labour market outcomes differ between the two groups.FindingsThe empirical results are based on the Swiss Labor Force Survey (SLFS) and demonstrate that mixed educational paths are well rewarded in the labor market. However, for entrepreneurs a high return is also associated with a high income variance.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings provide evidence for the existence of complementarities between vocational and academic education. Further research on mixed educational paths might provide more insight into this presumed relationship.Practical implicationsSince the results indicate that mixed educational paths are a worthwhile strategy, the permeability of a national education system is a very important educational policy issue.Originality/valueThe study is innovative in three ways: first, it focuses on complete educational paths and not just the highest educational degree. Second, an alternative measure, the Baldwin rate of return, is used to assess the profitability attached to different educational paths. Third, the income risk associated with each educational path is calculated.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management
Reference41 articles.
1. Baldwin, R.H. (1959), “How to assess investment proposals”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 37 No. 3, pp. 98‐104.
2. Becker, G.S. (1964), Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, NY.
3. Benz, M. and Frey, B.S. (2008), “Being independent is a great thing: subjective evaluations of self‐employment and hierarchy”, Economica, Vol. 75 No. 298, pp. 362‐83.
4. BfS (2006), Selbständige Erwerbstätigkeit in der Schweiz, Bundesamt für Statistik (BfS), Neuenburg.
5. Brunello, G. and Comi, S. (2004), “Education and earnings growth: evidence from 11 European countries”, Economics of Education Review, Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 75‐83.
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献