BSC’s Perspectives Ranking towards Organizational Performance: An Empirical Study Performed with Portuguese Exporters

Author:

Oliveira CidáliaORCID,Rodrigues MargaridaORCID,Silva RuiORCID,Meirinhos GalvãoORCID,Franco MárioORCID

Abstract

Bearing the growing competition between organisations in mind, managers are focused on keeping on with the search for strategic alignment and performance monitoring. The literature has shed much light into the field of Management but a guide to monitor the defined strategy via Balanced Scorecard (BSC) is still lacking. Few studies have made their focus the question of which perspectives are the most relevant; it is therefore likely that there are different importance rankings between organisations with and without BSC. Highlighting the need to bring insight into this research field concerning the organizational performance measurement of the BSC, quantitative research was performed, to analyse the different rankings of the four perspectives, comparing organisations with and without BSC. The sample was composed of 107 out of the 250 major export organisations of Portugal. The outcomes confirm that the most relevant perspective is indeed the financial perspective, followed by the customer perspective, a finding unanimous in both types of organization (with and without BSC). For organizations without BSC, in third place stands the internal perspective, but, contrastingly, it comes after learning and growth perspective for organisations with BSC. The perspective of learning and growth differs in its rankings between organisations with and without BSC, as it shows up at third position for organizations with BSC, and at the fourth (last) position in organizations without BSC. This research has relevant outcomes for both managers and academia, as it is still a fertile ground, as it guides managers to identify the importance assigned by major exporters to different perspectives, in order to link its indicators. Despite having different levels of importance assigned to the third and fourth perspective, BSC is known and regarded as a meaningful management tool, even by managers who do not have BSC implemented. It conceivably still has growing possibilities in several activity areas.

Funder

FCT I.P

FCT—Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology

NECE-UBI, Research Centre for Business Sciences, Research Centre

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference96 articles.

1. Rodrigues, M., and Franco, M. (2019). The corporate sustainability strategy in organisations: A systematic review and future directions. Sustainability, 11.

2. Chapman, C. (2005). Moving from Strategic Measurement to Strategic Data Analysis, Oxford University Press.

3. Inter-organizational controls and organizational competencies: Episodes around target cost management/functional analysis and open book accounting;Mouritsen;Contemp. Account. Res.,1998

4. Oliveira, C., Martins, A., Camilleri, M.A., and Shital, J. (2020). Using the Balanced Scorecard for Strategic Communication and Performance Management, Emerald Publishing Limited.

5. The use of balanced scorecards in the strategic management of corporate communication;Ritter;Corp. Commun. Int. J.,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3