A Review on Tactile Displays for Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery

Author:

Colan JacintoORCID,Davila AnaORCID,Hasegawa YasuhisaORCID

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery (LS) is a minimally invasive technique that offers many advantages over traditional open surgery: it reduces trauma, scarring, and shortens recovery time. However, an important limitation is the loss of tactile sensations. Although some progress has been made in robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) setups, RMIS is still not widely accessible. This review aims to identify which tactile display technologies have been proposed and experimentally validated for the restoration of tactile sensations during conventional laparoscopic surgical tasks. We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We identified relevant articles published over the past 10 years through a search on Web of science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore Digital, and PubMed repositories. A total of 143 articles met the inclusion criteria and 24 were included in the final review. From the reviewed articles, we classified the proposed tactile displays into two categories based on the use of skin contact: (i) skin tactile displays, which include vibrotactile, skin-indentation, and grip-feedback devices, and (ii) non-contact tactile displays based on visualization tools. This survey aims to contribute to further research in the area of tactile displays for laparoscopic surgery by providing a better understanding of the current state of the art and identifying the remaining challenges.

Funder

JST CREST

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference41 articles.

1. Saddik, A.E. (2012). Haptics Rendering and Applications, IntechOpen. Chapter 7.

2. Xin, H., Zelek, J., and Carnahan, H. (, 2006). Laparoscopic surgery, perceptual limitations and force: A review. Proceedings of the First Canadian Student Conference on Biomedical Computing, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

3. Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator;Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assist. Surg.,2013

4. DiMaio, S., Hanuschik, M., and Kreaden, U. (2011). Surgical Robotics, Springer.

5. Colan, J., Nakanishi, J., Aoyama, T., and Hasegawa, Y. (2020). A Cooperative Human-Robot Interface for Constrained Manipulation in Robot-Assisted Endonasal Surgery. Appl. Sci., 10.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3