Response to Prone Position in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients with Severe ARDS Supported by vvECMO

Author:

Textoris Laura1,Gragueb-Chatti Ines1,Daviet Florence1,Valera Sabine1,Sanz Céline1,Papazian Laurent12,Forel Jean-Marie13,Hraiech Sami13,Roch Antoine13,Guervilly Christophe13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13015 Marseille, France

2. Centre Hospitalier de Bastia, Service de Réanimation, 604 Chemin de Falconaja, 20600 Bastia, France

3. Centre d’Études et de Recherches sur les Services de Santé et Qualité de vie EA 3279, Aix-Marseille Université, 13005 Marseille, France

Abstract

Background: For moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), lung-protective ventilation combined with prolonged and repeated prone position (PP) is recommended. For the most severe patients for whom this strategy failed, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) allows a reduction in ventilation-induced lung injury and improves survival. Some aggregated data have suggested a benefit regarding survival in pursuing PP during vv-ECMO. The combination of PP and vv-ECMO has been also documented in COVID-19 studies, although there is scarce evidence concerning respiratory mechanics and gas exchange response. The main objective was to compare the physiological response of the first PP during vv-ECMO in two cohorts of patients (COVID-19-related ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS) regarding respiratory system compliance (CRS) and oxygenation changes. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, and ambispective cohort study in the ECMO center of Marseille, France. ECMO was indicated according to the EOLIA trial criteria. Results: A total of 85 patients were included, 60 in the non-COVID-19 ARDS group and 25 in the COVID-19-related ARDS group. Lung injuries of the COVID-19 cohort exhibited significantly higher severity with a lower CRS at baseline. Concerning the main objective, the first PP during vv-ECMO was not associated with a change in CRS or other variation in respiratory mechanic variables in both cohorts. By contrast, oxygenation was improved only in the non-COVID-19 ARDS group after a return to the supine position. Mean arterial pressure was higher during PP as compared with a return to the supine position in the COVID-19 group. Conclusion: We found distinct physiological responses to the first PP in vv-ECMO-supported ARDS patients according to the COVID-19 etiology. This could be due to higher severity at baseline or specificity of the disease. Further investigations are warranted.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference24 articles.

1. ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri, V.M., Rubenfeld, G.D., Thompson, B., Ferguson, N., Caldwell, E., Fan, E., Camporota, L., and Slutsky, A.S. (2012). Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin Definition. JAMA, 307, 2526–2533.

2. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline: Mechanical Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome;Fan;Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,2017

3. Ventilator-induced lung injury;Slutsky;N. Engl. J. Med.,2013

4. Mechanical Ventilation Management during Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. An International Multicenter Prospective Cohort;Schmidt;Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,2019

5. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome;Combes;N. Engl. J. Med.,2018

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3