Affiliation:
1. Postgraduate Program in Administration Department, Londrina State University, Londrina 86057-970, Brazil
2. Production Engineering Department, Federal Technological University of Paraná, Londrina 86036-370, Brazil
Abstract
While biogas production offers promising solutions for waste management, energy diversification, and sustainable development, effective project implementation requires comprehensive evaluation criteria that encompass diverse aspects, such as the problem to be addressed, biodigester technology selection, business model development, investment considerations, and final product utilization. A preliminary study involving an integrative review of 58 articles yielded 499 unique criteria. These criteria were categorized into four groups: economic, environmental, social, and technical, encompassing a total of 39 subcriteria. Six stages of the biogas production cycle were considered in the analysis: project, initiation, biodigester type selection, location determination, operational cycle definition, and final product utilization. The analysis revealed that existing decision-making models often prioritize technical and economic considerations while neglecting broader social and environmental perspectives. This paper addresses this gap by proposing, for the first time, stage-specific, multicriteria decision-making (MDCA) models tailored to each phase of a biogas production cycle. These models empower project managers and policymakers to optimize resource allocation, minimize the environmental impact, maximize social benefits, and ensure project viability and profitability. The models’ adaptability allows for tailored prioritization based on specific project requirements and contexts. This groundbreaking research fills a critical void in biogas decision making by bridging the gap between existing technical and economic model limitations and the growing need for truly sustainable project development.
Reference62 articles.
1. Von-Winterfeldt, D., and Edwards, W. (1986). Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, Cambridge University Press.
2. Biogas in the transport sector—Actor and policy analysis focusing on the demand side in the Stockholm region;Ammenberg;Resour. Conserv. Recycl.,2018
3. Roubík, H., Mazancová, J., Le-Dinh, P., Dinh-Van, D., and Banout, J. (2018). Biogas quality across small-scale biogas plants: A case of central Vietnam. Energies, 11.
4. Evaluation of biogas production and usage potential;Kalinichenko;Ecol. Chem. Eng.,2016
5. Towards a sustainable capacity expansion of the Danish biogas sector;Bojesen;Land Use Policy,2015
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献