Comparison between the RANS Simulations of Double-Body Flow and Water–Air Flow around a Ship in Static Drift and Circle Motions

Author:

Jiang Long,Yao Jianxi,Liu Zuyuan

Abstract

Manoeuvrability is one of the important ship hydrodynamic performances. That is closely related to the safety and economy of navigation. The development of a high-accuracy and high-efficiency numerical method to compute the forces and moments on manoeuvring ships has been the main task for ship manoeuvring predictions. The numerical method by solving RANS (Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes) equations may be the most used one nowadays for the computations of ship manoeuvring forces and moments. However, applying a RANS tool for ship manoeuvring prediction remains very low efficiency, especially considering the six-degrees-of-freedom ship motions on the water surface. Thus, it is very necessary to introduce a few assumptions to reduce the computational time when applying a RANS tool, e.g., the assumptions of double-body flow and body force propeller, and consequently improve the application efficiency. Generally speaking, the assumption of double-body flow, in which the free-surface effects are neglected, is more suitable for low-speed ships. Nevertheless, rare publications have been reported relating to how this assumption affects the accuracy of the computed manoeuvring forces and moments. To this end, this article presents a comparative study between the RANS simulations of double-body flow and water–air flow around a container ship performing static drift and static circle motions. Three ship speeds, corresponding to the Froude numbers 0.156, 0.201, and 0.260, respectively, are considered during the simulations. The computed side forces and yaw moments obtained by the water–air flow simulations are closer to the available experimental data than that obtained by the double-body flow simulations for all ship speeds. The computed surge forces obtained by water–air flow simulations also agree well with the experimental data, whereas the computed surge forces obtained by the double-body flow simulations are wrong. The reasons are analyzed by comparing the pressure distributions on the ship surface and the flow separations around the ship.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Ocean Engineering,Water Science and Technology,Civil and Structural Engineering

Reference24 articles.

1. Computation of the turbulent flow around a ship model in steady turn and in steady oblique motion;Cura-Hochbaum;Proceedings of the 22nd Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics,1998

2. Maneuvering prediction for two tankers based on RANS simulations;Cura-Hochbaum;Proceedings of the Simman Workshop on Verification & Validation of Ship Maneuvering Simulation Methods,2008

3. Estimation of the hydrodynamic derivatives by RaNS simulation of planar motion mechanism test

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3