Community-Level, Participatory Co-Design for Landslide Warning with Implications for Climate Services
-
Published:2023-02-28
Issue:5
Volume:15
Page:4294
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Lempert Robert1, Busch Lisa2, Brown Ryan1, Patton Annette2, Turner Sara3, Schmidt Jacyn4, Young Tammy5
Affiliation:
1. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA 2. Sitka Sound Science Center, Sitka, AK 99835, USA 3. Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA 4. Central Council of the Tlingit & Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska, Juneau, AK 99801, USA 5. Sitka Tribe of Alaska, Sitka, AK 99835, USA
Abstract
Inclusive, participatory governance is a key enabler of effective responses to natural hazard risks exacerbated by climate change. This paper describes a community-level co-design process among academic, state, and federal scientists and the community of Sitka, Alaska to develop a novel landslide warning system for this small coastal town. The decentralized system features an online dashboard which displays current and forecast risk levels to help residents make their own risk management decisions. The system and associated risk communications are informed by new geoscience, social, and information science generated during the course of the project. This case study focuses on our project team’s activities and addresses questions including: what activities did the project team conduct, what did these activities intend to accomplish, and did these activities accomplish what they intended? The paper describes the co-design process, the associated changes in system design and research activities, and formal and informal evaluations of the system and process. Overall, the co-design process appears to have generated a warning system the Sitka community finds valuable, helped to align system design with local knowledge and community values, significantly modified the scientists’ research agendas, and helped navigate sensitivities such as the effect of landslide exposure maps on property values. Other communities in SE Alaska are now adopting this engagement approach. The paper concludes with broader implications for the role of community-level, participatory co-design and risk governance for climate services.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference50 articles.
1. Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D.C., Poloczanska, E.S., Mintenbeck, K., Tignor, M., Alegría, A., Craig, M.T., Langsdorf, S., Löschke, S., and Möller, V. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press. 2. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review;Reed;Biol. Conserv.,2008 3. Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D.C., Poloczanska, E.S., Mintenbeck, K., Tignor, M., Alegría, A., Craig, M., Langsdorf, S., Löschke, S., and Möller, V. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press. 4. Run Uphill for a Tsunami, Downhill for a Landslide;Busch;Issues Sci. Technol.,2021 5. Howlett, M., and Mukherjee, I. (2018). Routledge Handbook of Policy Design, Routledge.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|