Beyond Climate Ready? A History of Seattle Public Utilities’ Ongoing Evolution from Environmental and Climate Risk Management to Integrated Sustainability
-
Published:2023-03-10
Issue:6
Volume:15
Page:4977
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Grodnik-Nagle Ann1, Sukhdev Ashima1, Vogel Jason2ORCID, Herrick Charles3
Affiliation:
1. Seattle Public Utilities, Seattle Municipal Tower, 700 5th Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104, USA 2. Climate Impacts Group (CIG), University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 3. Washington Center, New York University, Washington, DC 20016, USA
Abstract
Seattle Public Utilities (SPU) is a municipal water supply, drainage, wastewater, and solid waste management utility in Seattle, Washington. This utility has explored the impacts of climate change and supported climate adaptation work since 1997. Faced with threats such as sea level rise, drought, wildfires, and extreme precipitation events, SPU has worked to “mainstream” climate science throughout its strategic planning, capital investments, management, operations, staffing, institutional culture, and more. This paper provides a descriptive, chronologically ordered account of how SPU’s climate-change-related work has evolved to become an aspect of a broader social and environmental sustainability orientation, aimed at resilience against climate impacts, but also towards improving greenhouse gas emissions reduction, carbon sequestration, water and waste circularity, green infrastructure, ecosystem and species stewardship, green and blue workforce development, affordability, an intergenerational perspective, and environmental justice. We frame this transition as a movement from a core focus on risk management toward a proactive and integrated mode of sustainable operations. While SPU’s journey has been enabled by a co-productive approach to climate services, we speculate on how this model can be broadened and diversified to help SPU pursue their goal of becoming a sustainable organization. It is our hope that this paper sparks reflection and discussion within the climate services community, amongst utilities, municipalities, and policy entrepreneurs that are interested in sustainability.
Funder
Washington State legislature
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference83 articles.
1. Research methods—A case example of participant observation;Iacono;Electron. J. Bus. Res. Methods,2009 2. Barsugli, J., Anderson, C., Smith, J., and Vogel, J. (2022, July 14). Options for Improving Climate Modeling to Assist Water Utility Planning for Climate Change. Prepared for Water Utility Climate Alliance. Available online: http://www.wucaonline.org/assets/pdf/pubs-whitepaper-120909.pdf. 3. Two faces of uncertainty: Climate science and water utility planning methods;Barsugli;J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag.,2012 4. Ferguson, D.B., Rice, J., and Woodhouse, C.A. (2022, August 20). Linking Environmental Research and Practice: Lessons from the Integration of Climate Science and Water Management in the Western United States. Prepared for Climate Assessment for the Southwest, University of Arizona. Available online: https://www.climas.arizona.edu/sites/climas.arizona.edu/files/pdflink-res-prac-2014-final.pdf. 5. Policies enabling resilience in Seattle’s water services;Inha;Eur. J. Creat. Pract. Cities Landsc.,2009
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|