Resilience Assessment in Urban Water Infrastructure: A Critical Review of Approaches, Strategies and Applications
-
Published:2023-07-17
Issue:14
Volume:15
Page:11151
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Asghari Fatemeh1, Piadeh Farzad2, Egyir Daniel2, Yousefi Hossein1ORCID, Rizzuto Joseph P.2, Campos Luiza C.3ORCID, Behzadian Kourosh23ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of New Sciences and Technologies, University of Tehran, Tehran 67187-73654, Iran 2. School of Computing and Engineering, University of West London, London W5 5RF, UK 3. Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, Gower St., London WC1E 6BT, UK
Abstract
Urban water infrastructure (UWI) comprises the main systems, including water supply systems (WSS), urban drainage/stormwater systems (UDS) and wastewater systems (WWS). The UWI needs to be resilient to a wide range of shocks and stresses, including structural failures such as pipe breakage and pump breakdown and functional failures such as unmet water demand/quality, flooding and combined sewer overflows. However, there is no general consensus about the resilience assessment of these systems widely presented by various research works. This study aims to critically review the approaches, strategies and applications of the resilience assessment for the complex systems in UWI. This review includes examining bibliometric analysis, developed frameworks related to resilience assessment to help comprehend resilience concepts for the specified UWI systems in urban settings, strategies for improving resilience, resilience indicators and common tools used for modelling resilience assessment in UWI. The results indicate that resilience assessment has primarily been conducted in developed countries, underscoring the macroeconomic significance of UWI. Three key areas have been identified for analysing resilience in UWI: system design, development of resilience concepts and implementation of green infrastructure. Moreover, it has been discovered that although resilience is commonly defined using technical approaches, a more comprehensive understanding of resilience can be gained through a holistic approach. Furthermore, while strategies such as system upgrades, decentralisation, digitalisation and nature-based solutions can enhance UWI resilience, they may be insufficient to fulfil all resilience indicators. To address the challenge of effectively comparing different resilience options, it is crucial to extensively examine comprehensive and sustainability-based indicators in future research.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference89 articles.
1. World Bank (2020). Resilient Water Infrastructure Design Brief, World Bank. 2. Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., Adepu, N., and Safapour, E. (2021). Resilience in Water Infrastructures: A Review of Challenges and Adoption Strategies. Sustainability, 13. 3. Van Duin, B., Zhu, D.Z., Zhang, W., Muir, R.J., Johnston, C., Kipkie, C., and Rivard, G. (2021). Toward More Resilient Urban Stormwater Management Systems—Bridging the Gap from Theory to Implementation. Front. Water, 3. 4. Leigh, N.G., and Lee, H. (2019). Sustainable and Resilient Urban Water Systems: The Role of Decentralization and Planning. Sustainability, 11. 5. Resilience Theory Incorporated into Urban Wastewater Systems Management. State of the Art;Butler;Water Res.,2017
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|