Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Engineering, University of Rijeka, Vukovarska 58, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
2. Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Rijeka, Studentska 2, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
Abstract
In this paper, the dataset is collected from the fluidic muscle datasheet. This dataset is then used to train models predicting the pressure, force, and contraction length of the fluidic muscle, as three separate outputs. This modeling is performed with four algorithms—extreme gradient boosted trees (XGB), ElasticNet (ENet), support vector regressor (SVR), and multilayer perceptron (MLP) artificial neural network. Each of the four models of fluidic muscles (5-100N, 10-100N, 20-200N, 40-400N) is modeled separately: First, for a later comparison. Then, the combined dataset consisting of data from all the listed datasets is used for training. The results show that it is possible to achieve quality regression performance with the listed algorithms, especially with the general model, which performs better than individual models. Still, room for improvement exists, due to the high variance of the results across validation sets, possibly caused by non-normal data distributions.
Reference29 articles.
1. Fluid-driven artificial muscles: Bio-design, manufacturing, sensing, control, and applications;Zhang;Bio-Des. Manuf.,2021
2. Šitum, Ž., Herceg, S., Bolf, N., and Ujević Andrijić, Ž. (2023). Design, Construction and Control of a Manipulator Driven by Pneumatic Artificial Muscles. Sensors, 23.
3. Agrawal, R., and Chowlur, S. (2023, January 11). Instrumentation and Control of a Fluidic Muscle-Based Exoskeleton Device for Leg Rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC), Laurel, MD, USA.
4. Antonsson, T. (2023). Dynamic Modelling of a Fluidic Muscle with a Comparison of Hysteresis Approaches, KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
5. Garbulinski, J., Balasankula, S.C., and Wereley, N.M. (2021). Characterization and analysis of extensile fluidic artificial muscles. Actuators, 10.