A Review of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas Based on Artificial Intelligence

Author:

Stopyra Wiktor12ORCID,Cooke David L.34ORCID,Grzybowski Andrzej5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. MW-Med Eye Centre, 31-416 Krakow, Poland

2. Department of Medicine, University of Applied Sciences, 34-400 Nowy Targ, Poland

3. Great Lakes Eye Care, Saint Joseph, MI 49085, USA

4. Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA

5. Institute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, 61-553 Poznan, Poland

Abstract

Purpose: The proper selection of an intraocular lens power calculation formula is an essential aspect of cataract surgery. This study evaluated the accuracy of artificial intelligence-based formulas. Design: Systematic review. Methods: This review comprises articles evaluating the exactness of artificial intelligence-based formulas published from 2017 to July 2023. The papers were identified by a literature search of various databases (Pubmed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Crossref, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SciELO) using the terms “IOL formulas”, “FullMonte”, “Ladas”, “Hill-RBF”, “PEARL-DGS”, “Kane”, “Karmona”, “Hoffer QST”, and “Nallasamy”. In total, 25 peer-reviewed articles in English with the maximum sample and the largest number of compared formulas were examined. Results: The scores of the mean absolute error and percentage of patients within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D were used to estimate the exactness of the formulas. In most studies the Kane formula obtained the smallest mean absolute error and the highest percentage of patients within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D. Second place was typically achieved by the PEARL DGS formula. The limitations of the studies were also discussed. Conclusions: Kane seems to be the most accurate artificial intelligence-based formula. PEARL DGS also gives very good results. Hoffer QST, Karmona, and Nallasamy are the newest, and need further evaluation.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference61 articles.

1. Evaluating refractive outcomes after cataract surgery;Aristodemou;Ophthalmology,2019

2. Intraocular lens power calculation formula accuracy: Comparison of 12 formulas for trifocal hydrophilic intraocular lens;Flikier;Eur. J. Ophthalmol.,2021

3. Refractive lens exchange;Alio;Surv. Ophthalmol.,2014

4. A Comparative Study to Assess the Predictability of Different IOL Power Calculation Formulas in Eyes of Short and Long Axial Length;Doshi;J. Clin. Diagn. Res.,2017

5. Accuracy of Intraocular Lens calculation Formulas;Melles;Ophthalmology,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3