Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Children—A Systematic Review

Author:

Stopyra Wiktor12ORCID,Grzybowski Andrzej34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. MW-Med Eye Centre, 31-416 Krakow, Poland

2. Department of Medicine, University of Applied Sciences, 34-400 Nowy Targ, Poland

3. Institute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, 61-553 Poznan, Poland

4. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland

Abstract

Objectives: The selection of an appropriate formula for intraocular lens power calculation is crucial in phacoemulsification, particularly in pediatric patients. The most commonly used formulas are described and their accuracy evaluated in this study. Methods: This review includes papers evaluating the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas for children’s eyes published from 2019–2024. The articles were identified by a literature search of medical and other databases (Pubmed/MEDLINE, Crossref, Google Scholar) using the combination of the following key words: “IOL power calculation formula”, “pediatric cataract”, “congenital cataract”, “pediatric intraocular lens implantation”, “lens power estimation”, “IOL power selection”, “phacoemulsification”, “Hoffer Q”, “Holladay 1”, “SRK/T”, “Barrett Universal II”, “Hill-RBF”, and “Kane”. A total of 14 of the most recent peer-reviewed papers in English with the maximum sample sizes and the greatest number of compared formulas were considered. Results: The outcomes of mean absolute error and percentage of predictions within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D were used to assess the accuracy of the formulas. In terms of MAE, Hoffer Q yielded the best result most often, just ahead of SRK/T and Barrett Universal II, which, together with Holladay 1, most often yielded the second-best outcomes. Considering patients with PE within ±1.0 D, Barrett Universal II most often gave the best results and Holladay 1 most often gave the second-best. Conclusions: Barrett Universal II seems to be the most accurate formula for intraocular lens calculation for children’s eyes. Very good postoperative outcomes can also be achieved using the Holladay 1 formula. However, there is still no agreement in terms of formula choice.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference49 articles.

1. Epidemiology of blindness in children;Solebo;Arch. Dis. Child.,2017

2. Analysis of accuracy of twelve intraocular lens power calculation formulas for eyes with axial myopia;Stopyra;Taiwan J. Ophthalmol.,2022

3. Accuracy of the Hill–radial basis function method and the Barrett Universal II formula;Nemeth;Eur. J. Ophthalmol.,2021

4. Analysis of accuracy of twelve intraocular lens power calculation formulas for eyes with axial hy-peropia;Stopyra;Saudi J Ophthalmol.,2023

5. Benchmarks for outcome indicators in pediatric cataract surgery;Nihalani;Eye,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3