The Effects of Grass Silage Additive Type and Barley Grain Preservation Method on Rumen Function, Microbial Ecology, and Energy Metabolism of Dairy Cows

Author:

Bayat Ali R.1ORCID,Tapio Ilma1ORCID,Franco Marcia1ORCID,Stefański Tomasz1ORCID,Mäntysaari Päivi1ORCID,Rinne Marketta1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Production Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), FI-31600 Jokioinen, Finland

Abstract

The effects of grass silage and barley grain preservation methods on dairy cows were evaluated using four Nordic Red dairy cows placed in respiration chambers in a 4 × 4 Latin square. Silage was conserved using a formic acid-based product (AS) or a homofermentative lactic acid bacteria inoculant (IS), while grains were dried (DB) or crimped and ensiled (EB). Fermentation profile of silages and the chemical composition of the mixed diets were very similar. The dietary treatments did not affect feed intake, milk production, and rumen fermentation except molar proportion of butyrate, and energy metabolism. Digestibility of dry matter and organic matter were higher (p < 0.05) and that of crude protein was lower (p < 0.05) for AS than IS. Feeding EB compared to DB decreased (p < 0.05) diet organic matter and starch digestibility. The cows receiving AS tended (p = 0.06) to emit more methane per day than those receiving IS, but methane yield and intensity were not different between dietary treatments. Bacteria alpha diversity was higher (p < 0.01) in barley samples than grass silages and was not affected by the diet in rumen samples. All freshly prepared rations were dominated by Lactobacillaceae, Erwiniaceae, and Pseudomonadaceae but rations based on AS than IS remained more stable over 2 days. In conclusion, grass silage and barley grain preservation methods did not affect the measured parameters in dairy cows and the preservation method can be selected based on practical on-farm factors.

Funder

Academy of Finland

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Veterinary (miscellaneous)

Reference52 articles.

1. Highlights of Progress in Silage Conservation and Future Perspectives;Wilkinson;Grass Forage Sci.,2018

2. McDonald, P., Edwards, R.A., Greenhalgh, J.F.D., Morgan, C.A., Sinclair, L.A., and Wilkinson, R.G. (1991). Animal Nutrition, Prentice Hall/Pearson. [7th ed.].

3. Silage Review: Recent Advances and Future Uses of Silage Additives;Muck;J. Dairy Sci.,2018

4. Evaluation of the Factors Affecting Silage Intake of Dairy Cows: A Revision of the Relative Silage Dry-Matter Intake Index;Huhtanen;Animal,2007

5. Volatile Fatty Acid Proportions and Microbial Protein Synthesis in the Rumen of Cattle Receiving Grass Silage Ensiled with Different Rates of Formic Acid;Jaakkola;Grass Forage Sci.,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3