Drug Optimization in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Colitis: A Global Survey

Author:

D’Amico Ferdinando1ORCID,Jairath Vipul2,Paridaens Kristine3ORCID,Peyrin-Biroulet Laurent456789,Danese Silvio1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele and Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy

2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, CA 91766, Canada

3. Ferring International Center S.A., 1162 Saint-Prex, Switzerland

4. Department of Gastroenterology, Nancy University Hospital, F-54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France

5. Inserm, NGERE, University of Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France

6. INFINY Institute, Nancy University Hospital, F-54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France

7. FHU-CURE, Nancy University Hospital, F-54500 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France

8. Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré—Hartmann, Paris IBD Center, 92200 Neuilly sur Seine, France

9. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis (UC) is challenging. Although there are commonly used guidelines, therapy optimization is not standardized. We conducted a survey to investigate the management and treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate UC. Methods: Physicians with experience in treating inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) were invited to participate in an anonymous, multiple-choice survey between June and July 2023. The survey addressed various issues of patient care such as patient monitoring, treatment optimization, follow-up, treatment decision making, and therapy de-escalation. Results: The survey included 222 physicians (59.9% men; mean age = 50.4 years) from 66 countries worldwide. Gastroenterologists were the most represented specialists (89.6%), followed by surgeons (3.2%), and internal medicine doctors (2.7%). Two-thirds of the participants (66.7%) had >10 years of experience in the field of IBD. The combination of oral (≥4 g/day) and rectal 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) was the preferred choice when optimizing therapy. Budesonide MMX (41.8%) and systemic steroids (39.9%) were preferred in patients who failed 5-ASA. Treatment decisions were predominantly based on endoscopic (99.0%) or clinical (59.8%) activity. A significant percentage of clinicians did not optimize therapy in the case of increased fecal calprotectin alone (45.1%) or radiological/ultrasound activity (39.8%) alone. Conclusions: The guidelines for the management of mild-to-moderate UC are well accepted in clinical practice. Endoscopic remission remains the main therapeutic target, followed by clinical remission. Fecal calprotectin and intestinal ultrasound still elicit complaints from physicians.

Funder

Ferring

Publisher

MDPI AG

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3