Affiliation:
1. School of Art and Design, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510090, China
Abstract
The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in programming assistance has garnered researchers’ attention for its potential to reduce learning costs for users, increase work efficiency, and decrease repetitive coding tasks. However, given the novelty of AI Coding Assistant Tools (AICATs), user acceptance is currently limited, and the factors influencing this phenomenon are unclear. This study proposes an expanded model based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) that incorporates the characteristics of AICAT users to explore the key factors affecting college students’ willingness to use AICATs. Utilizing a survey methodology, 303 Chinese participants completed the questionnaire. Factor analysis and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) results indicate that users’ dependence worry (DW) about AICATs positively affects perceived risk (PR), which in turn negatively impacts perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU), thus reducing user willingness to use. Dependence concerns also negatively impact perceived trust (PT), while PT positively affects PU and PEOU, thereby enhancing willingness to use. Additionally, a user’s self-efficacy (SE) negatively impacts DW and positively affects PEOU. This study discusses the potential significance of these findings and offers suggestions for AICAT developers to foster and promote widespread use.
Funder
National Social Science Foundation of China
Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Fund Project of the Ministry of Education
Key Project of Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Innovation Strategy Special Fund
Reference81 articles.
1. OpenAI (2024, January 17). ChatGPT: Optimizing Language Models for Dialogue. OpenAI. Available online: https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/.
2. Harrison Dupré, M. (2024, February 03). ChatGPT’s Explosive Popularity Makes It the Fastest-Growing App in Human History. Available online: https://futurism.com/the-byte/chatgpts-fastest-growing-app-human-history.
3. Becker, B.A., Denny, P., Finnie-Ansley, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., Prather, J., and Santos, E.A. (2023, January 15–18). Programming Is Hard—Or at Least It Used to Be. Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1, Toronto, ON, Canada.
4. Pearce, H., Ahmad, B., Tan, B., Dolan-Gavitt, B., and Karri, R. (2022, January 22–26). Asleep at the Keyboard? Assessing the Security of GitHub Copilot’s Code Contributions. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), San Francisco, CA, USA.
5. Dijkstra, E.W. (2007). A Preliminary Investigation into Computer Assisted Programming, The University of Texas.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献