Abstract
Considering that driving stress is a major contributor to traffic accidents, detecting drivers’ stress levels in time is helpful for ensuring driving safety. This paper attempts to investigate the ability of ultra-short-term (30-s, 1-min, 2-min, and 3-min) HRV analysis for driver stress detection under real driving circumstances. Specifically, the t-test was used to investigate whether there were significant differences in HRV features under different stress levels. Ultra-short-term HRV features were compared with the corresponding short-term (5-min) features during low-stress and high-stress phases by the Spearman rank correlation and Bland–Altman plots analysis. Furthermore, four different machine-learning classifiers, including a support vector machine (SVM), random forests (RFs), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and Adaboost, were evaluated for stress detection. The results show that the HRV features extracted from ultra-short-term epochs were able to detect binary drivers’ stress levels accurately. In particular, although the capability of HRV features in detecting driver stress also varied between different ultra-short-term epochs, MeanNN, SDNN, NN20, and MeanHR were selected as valid surrogates of short-term features for driver stress detection across the different epochs. For drivers’ stress levels classification, the best performance was achieved with the SVM classifier, with an accuracy of 85.3% using 3-min HRV features. This study makes a contribution to building a robust and effective stress detection system using ultra-short-term HRV features under actual driving environments.
Funder
Sichuan Social Science Key Research Base National Park Research Center
Key Laboratory of Flight Techniques and Flight Safety
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy
Reference35 articles.
1. Detecting Stress during Real-World Driving Tasks Using Physiological Sensors;Healey;IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.,2005
2. Driver Stress as Influenced by Driving Maneuvers and Roadway Conditions;Hill;Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav.,2007
3. Evaluating the Impact of Adaptive Signal Control Technology on Driver Stress and Behavior Using Real-World Experimental Data;Khattak;Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav.,2018
4. Schmidt, P., Reiss, A., Dürichen, R., and Laerhoven, K. (2019). Van Wearable-Based Affect Recognition—A Review. Sensors, 19.
5. Comparison of Self-Report and Objective Measures of Driving Behavior and Road Safety: A Systematic Review;Kaye;J. Saf. Res.,2018
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献