Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Forestry, Bartın University, 74100 Bartın, Turkey
Abstract
This study evaluated vegetation management (VM) strategies under electricity distribution lines (EDLs) through ecosystem service (ES) criteria. Deforestation, worsened by insufficient VM practices, poses a threat to ecosystem stability. Using a hybrid FAHP (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) approach, ten VM strategies were assessed based on 15 ES criteria. The FAHP results identified biodiversity, timber resources, and erosion control as the most crucial criteria due to their significant weights. The TOPSIS analysis determined that VM6 (creation and restoration of scrub edges) was the most effective strategy, achieving a value of 0.744 for reducing deforestation and enhancing energy security. VM6 helps preserve forest cover and protect infrastructure by creating a “V”-shaped structures within the EDLs corridor. This study underscores the importance of ES-oriented VM strategies for sustainable vegetation management and deforestation mitigation. It also highlights the need for incorporating scientific, ES-based decision support mechanisms into VM strategy development. Future research should expand stakeholder perspectives and conduct a comprehensive assessment of ESs to ensure that VM strategies align with ecological and socio-economic sustainability. This study provides a framework for improving VM practices and offers directions for future sustainable energy management research. This study focuses exclusively on ecological criteria for evaluating VM strategies, neglecting other dimensions. Future research should use methods like ANP and fuzzy cognitive maps to explore inter-dimension relationships and their strengths. Additionally, employing SWARA, PIPRECIA, ELECTRE, and PROMETHEE for ranking VM strategies is recommended.
Funder
Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Industry and Technology
Reference99 articles.
1. FAO (2010). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010: Main Report, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).
2. The impacts of urban sprawl on ecological connectivity in the Montreal Metropolitan Region;Dupras;Environ. Sci. Policy,2016
3. Testing the sustainable livelihoods framework in the context of natural resource management: The case of post-mining rehabilitation in the Australian minerals industry;Clarke;Geogr. Res.,2008
4. Hudson, W.E. (1991). Landscape Connectivity: Different Functions at Different Scales. Landscape Linkages and Biodiversity, Island Press.
5. The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital;Costanza;Nature,1997