Affiliation:
1. College of Petroleum Engineering, China University of Petroleum Beijing, No. 18, Fuxue Road, Changping District, Beijing 102200, China
Abstract
Unconventional well technology is often used as one of the most important means to reduce costs and increase efficiency in oil fields. There are many methods for unconventional well type optimization, but there are relatively few studies on whether the well type is suitable for the reservoir. In this paper, a method for matching unconventional wells and reservoirs is established. In our method, we first simplify the reservoir and choose initial suitable well types based on experience and then use a semi-analytical model to calculate the production rate in different producing sections. After that, we define some parameters to evaluate the matching degree of well types and reservoirs. Finally, we determine whether these well types are suitable for the reservoir based on these parameters. At the end of the paper, we apply the method to a specific case. The result shows that a stepped well is suitable for exploiting thin interbed reservoirs, but it is necessary that the permeability and fluid viscosity in different layers are within a certain range, and the shape of the stepped well is also limited. This paper gives a specific value for this range and limitation. The method for matching unconventional wells and reservoirs proposed in this paper is helpful for guiding the selection of unconventional well types before drilling.
Funder
Science Foundation of China University of Petroleum, Beijing
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Energy Engineering and Power Technology,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Control and Optimization,Engineering (miscellaneous),Building and Construction
Reference50 articles.
1. Applied research of complex structure well in shale gas development;Yang;Sci. Technol. Eng.,2019
2. Study of completion techniques for unconventional wells;Shi;West-China Explor. Eng.,2010
3. Sahebi, H., Wiktorski, E., and Sui, D. (2022, January 27). Design, Optimization, and Visualization of Wellbore Trajectory in 3D. Proceedings of the SPE Norway Subsurface Conference, Bergen, Norway.
4. Al-Dabooni, S., Tawiq, A.A., and Alshehab, H. (2022, January 21–23). Dual Heuristic Dynamic Programming in the Oil and Gas Industry for Trajectory Tracking Control. Proceedings of the SPE Conference at Oman Petroleum & Energy Show, Muscat, Oman.
5. Alyaev, S., and Daireaux, B. (2021, January 8–12). Multi-Trajectory Hydraulic Model for More Accurate Geosteering Constraints. Proceedings of the SPE/IADC International Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Virtual.