Abstract
Policymakers pushing pension reforms have tended to justify changes on the basis that they would make systems more sustainable by lowering future spending on pensions. This is a rather narrow interpretation of sustainability that fails to consider that other fiscal programs may need to accommodate the impact of reforms that reduce pension system adequacy. In this light, this article argues that in order to correctly assess the sustainability of pension reforms, one needs to adopt a more holistic framework that encapsulates the interaction between pension system goals and constraints. In a number of countries, reforms focused solely on reducing future spending were followed by reforms that restored generosity. A holistic approach to assess pension sustainability could help limit this cycle of reform and increase trust in pension systems.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference55 articles.
1. Old-Age Income Support in the 21st Century: An International Perspective on Pension Systems and Reform;Holzmann,2005
2. Averting the Old-Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth,1994
3. The Economics of Pensions
4. Unequal Welfare States: Distributive Consequences of Population Ageing in Six European Countries;Soede,2004
5. Social Security, Induced Retirement, and Aggregate Capital Accumulation
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献