Abstract
This paper investigates the salience of religion and the centrality of religiosity among select LGBTQs. Much consideration has been given to the identity categories of sex, gender, sexual orientation, and religion. Means (M) and standard deviations (SD) were calculated for the overall CRSi-20 score and its five subscales. The results show that the overall CRSi-20 score is 3.68 (SD = 0.89), which indicates that the select LGBTQs are “religious”. As for the core dimensions of religiosity, the ideology subscale received the highest mean score (M = 4.16, SD = 0.88) while the public practice subscale received the lowest mean score (M = 3.21, SD = 1.15). The overall reliability of the survey is computed at 0.96, while the rest of the subscales have alpha values ranging from 0.81 to 0.95. Study outcomes confirm the general religiosity of participants, particularly among older respondents. Of the five subscales, ideology and private practice emerge as dominant categories. In terms of sex distribution, men tend to self-describe as “highly religious” in relation to women, who identify largely as “religious”.
Reference64 articles.
1. TIMELINE: SOGIE Equality in the Philippineshttps://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/explainers/timeline-sogie-equality-philippines
2. What Is The Rite of Holy Union?https://lgbtschristianchurch.wordpress.com/2017/09/21/what-is-the-rite-of-holy-union/
3. Understanding Catholic Youth Religiosity in a Developing Countryhttps://icsai.org/procarch/1iclehi/1iclehi-47.pdf
4. Sacred Camp: Transgendering Faith in a Philippine Festival
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献