A Consensus-Based 360 Degree Feedback Evaluation Method with Linguistic Distribution Assessments

Author:

Fan Chuanhao1,Wang Jiaxin1ORCID,Zhu Yan2,Zhang Hengjie1

Affiliation:

1. Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China

2. Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China

Abstract

The 360 degree feedback evaluation method is a multidimensional, comprehensive assessment method. Evaluators may hesitate among multiple evaluation values and be simultaneously constrained by the biases and cognitive errors of the evaluators, evaluation results are prone to unfairness and conflicts. To overcome these issues, this paper proposes a consensus-based 360 degree feedback evaluation method with linguistic distribution assessments. Firstly, evaluators provide evaluation information in the form of linguistic distribution. Secondly, utilizing an enhanced ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operator, the model aggregates multi-source evaluation information to handle biased evaluation information effectively. Subsequently, a consensus-reaching process is established to coordinate conflicting viewpoints among the evaluators, and a feedback adjustment mechanism is designed to guide evaluators in refining their evaluation information, facilitating the attainment of a unanimous evaluation outcome. Finally, the improved 360 degree feedback evaluation method was applied to the performance evaluation of the project leaders in company J, thereby validating the effectiveness and rationality of the method.

Funder

Social Science Fund of Jiangsu Province

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference63 articles.

1. Gaining feedback acceptance: Leader-member attachment style and psychological safety;London;Hum. Resour. Manage Rev.,2023

2. Multisource ratings of managerial competencies and their predictive value for managerial and organizational effectiveness;Semeijn;Hum. Resour. Manag.,2014

3. The implications of unconfounding multisource performance ratings;Jackson;J. Appl. Psychol.,2020

4. Leadership development: An outcome-oriented review based on time and levels of analyses;Day;Ann. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav.,2015

5. Construct validity evidence for multisource performance ratings: Is interrater reliability enough?;Ock;Ind. Organ. Psychol.,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3