Affiliation:
1. Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-010, Brazil
Abstract
Adaptive Optics (AO) systems have been developed throughout recent decades as a strategy to compensate for the effects of atmospheric turbulence, primarily caused by poor astronomical seeing. These systems reduce the wavefront distortions using deformable mirrors. Several AO simulation tools have been developed, such as the Object-Oriented, MATLAB, and Adaptive Optics Toolbox (OOMAO), to assist in the project of AO. However, the main AO simulators focus on AO models, not prioritizing the different control techniques. Moreover, the commonly applied control strategies in ground-based telescopes are based on Integral (I) or Proportional-Integral (PI) controllers. This work proposes the integration of OOMAO models to Simulink to support the development of advanced controllers and compares traditional controllers with intelligent systems based on fuzzy logic. The controllers were compared in three scenarios of different turbulence and atmosphere conditions. The simulations were performed using the characteristics/parameters of the Southern Astrophysical Research (SOAR) telescope and assessed with the Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM), Half Light Radius (HLR), and Strehl ratio metrics to compare the performance of the controllers. The results demonstrate that adaptive optics can be satisfactorily simulated in OOMAO adapted to Simulink and thus further increase the number of control strategies available to OOMAO. The comparative results between the MATLAB script and the Simulink blocks designed showed a maximum relative error of 3% in the Strehl ratio and 1.59% in the FWHM measurement. In the assessment of the control algorithms, the fuzzy PI controller reported a 25% increase in the FWHM metrics in the critical scenario when compared with open-loop metrics. Furthermore, the fuzzy PI controller outperformed the results when compared with the I and PI controllers. The findings underscore the constraints of conventional control methods, whereas the implementation of fuzzy-based controllers showcases the promise of intelligent approaches in enhancing control performance under challenging atmospheric conditions.
Funder
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brasil
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Subject
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Reference31 articles.
1. Pullen, W.C., Wang, T., Choi, H., Ke, X., Negi, V.S., Huang, L., Idir, M., and Kim, D. (2023). Statistical Tool Size Study for Computer-Controlled Optical Surfacing. Photonics, 10.
2. Adaptive Optics for Extremely Large Telescopes;Hippler;J. Astron. Instrum.,2019
3. Hardy, J.W. (1998). Adaptive Optics for Astronomical Telescopes, Oxford University Press.
4. Tyson, R.K. (2012). Topics in Adaptive Optics, IntechOpen.
5. Adaptive Optics for Astronomy;Davies;Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.,2012
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献