Abstract
The present study investigates the effect of three different methods of obtaining 1:1 and 1:5 soil-over-water mass ratios (soil:water) extracts for soil electrical conductivity (EC) measurements (EC1:1, EC1:5). On the same soil samples, also the electrical conductivity of the saturated paste extract (ECe) was determined and the relationships between ECe and each of the three of EC1:1 and EC1:5 values were examined. The soil samples used were collected from three areas over Greece (Laconia, Argolida and Kos) and had ECe values ranging from 0.611 to 25.9 dS m−1. From the results, it was shown that for soils with ECe < 3 dS m−1 the higher EC values were obtained by the method where the suspension remained at rest for 23 hours and then shaken mechanically for 1 h. On the contrary, no differences were observed among the three methods for soils with ECe > 3 dS m−1. Also, in the case of EC1:5, the optimal times for equilibration were much longer when ECe < 3 dS m−1. Across all soils, the relationships between ECe and each of three methods of obtaining EC1:1 and EC1:5 were strongly linear (0.953 < R2 < 0.991 and 0.63 < RMSE < 1.27 dS m−1). Taking into account the threshold of ECe = 3 dS m−1, different ECe = f(EC1:5) linear relationships were obtained. Although the linear model gave high values of R2 and RMSE for ECe < 3 dS m−1, the quadratic model resulted in better R2 and RMSE values for all methods examined. Correspondingly, in the 1:1 method, two of the three methods used exhibited similar slope values of the linear relationships independent of ECe value (ECe < 3 or ECe > 3 dS m−1), while one method (23 h rest and then shaken mechanically for 1 hour) showed significant differences in the slopes of the linear relationships between the two ranges of ECe.
Subject
Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献