The Use of Anabolic Steroids by Bodybuilders in the State of Sergipe, Brazil
-
Published:2024-05-16
Issue:5
Volume:14
Page:1451-1469
-
ISSN:2254-9625
-
Container-title:European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:EJIHPE
Author:
dos Santos Josué Cruz1, Souza Erivaldo de1, Meneses-Santos Daniela2, Carvalho Carla Roberta de Oliveira3, dos Santos Jymmys Lopes1, Aidar Felipe J.4ORCID, Marçal Anderson Carlos2
Affiliation:
1. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49100-000, Brazil 2. Departamento de Morfologia, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49100-000, Brazil 3. Departamento de Fisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas I, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil 4. Departamento de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão 49100-000, Brazil
Abstract
Bodybuilding, as a high-performance sport, requires regular strength and resistance exercises with the principal objective of increasing muscle hypertrophy. However, many bodybuilders resort to the use of anabolic-androgenic steroids (AASs) to improve their performance in a short period of time. This study employs a survey-type, cross-sectional, descriptive–analytical method to evaluate the profile of bodybuilding athletes in the State of Sergipe, Brazil, and verify the level of knowledge/awareness about the health risks and impacts resulting from the use of such substances. Finite- and convenience-type populations are assessed, including individuals of both sexes, aged older than 18 years, self-declared bodybuilding athletes residing in the State of Sergipe, Brazil, and participating in regional and/or state competitions. As a result, no significant relationships were determined between sex (p = 0.492), age (p = 0.460), family income (p = 0.141), and medical follow-up sessions. For the variables level of education and medical follow-up vs. no follow-up sessions, a significant result was achieved (p = 0.01), with 74.3% of individuals reporting having follow-up treatment and 25.7% responding that they had no follow-up treatment, a percentage representing the group that completed their higher education. The substances most used by the athletes were Sustanon 250 or Durateston, Nandrolone Decanoate (Deca or Deca-Durabolin), and Testosterone. The most-reported acute side effects were acne at 33.8% (n = 20), irritability at 32.1% (n = 19), alopecia (hair loss), and nervousness at 23.7% (n = 14). The most-reported chronic side effects were arterial hypertension at 36.0% (n = 9), liver disease at 28.0% (n = 7), and cancer (non-specific) at 8.0% (n = 2). We concluded that, regardless of the athletes’ socioeconomic profiles, the use of AASs was high, with two or more substances being used in combination and for a prolonged period. Thus, it is necessary to promote awareness campaigns regarding the use of AASs and their effects on high-performance and recreational athletes.
Funder
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brasil
Reference54 articles.
1. Negotiating limits, managing excesses: Everyday experiences of a group of bodybuilders;Arraes;Movimento,2020 2. Alves, R.C., Prestes, J., Enes, A., Moraes, W.M.A., Trindade, T.B., Salles, B.F., Aragon, A.A., and Souza-Junior, T.P. (2020). Training Programs Designed for Muscle Hypertrophy in Bodybuilders: A Narrative Review. Sports, 8. 3. Competitive Bodybuilding: Fitness, Pathology, or Both? Harv;Steele;Rev. Psychiatry,2019 4. Evidence-based recommendations for natural bodybuilding contest preparation: Nutrition and supplementation;Helms;J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr.,2014 5. Physiological implications of preparing for a natural male bodybuilding competition;Mitchell;Eur. J. Sport Sci.,2018
|
|