Testing Surgical Face Masks in an Emergency Context: The Experience of Italian Laboratories during the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis
-
Published:2021-02-04
Issue:4
Volume:18
Page:1462
-
ISSN:1660-4601
-
Container-title:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJERPH
Author:
Tessarolo FrancescoORCID, Nollo Giandomenico, Maniglio DevidORCID, Rigoni MartaORCID, Benedetti Luca, Helfer Fabrizia, Corradi Ivan, Rovati Luigi, Ferrari AlbertoORCID, Piccini MattiaORCID, Accorsi LucaORCID, Veronesi Elena, Cuoghi AuroraORCID, Baglio Salvo, Tuccitto NunzioORCID, Stefani Stefania, Stracquadanio Stefano, Caraci Filippo, Terrasi Antonio, Tricomi Alessia, Musumeci Mario, Miraglia Andrea, Cuttone GiacomoORCID, Cosentino SofiaORCID, Muscas CarloORCID, Vitali Luca AgostinoORCID, Petrelli Dezemona, Angrisani LeopoldoORCID, Colicchio Roberta, D’Anna Andrea, Iavicoli IvoORCID, De Falco Gianluigi, Di Natale Francesco, Di Maio Ernesto, Salvatore Paola, Quaglia FabianaORCID, Mingoia MarinaORCID, Castellini Paolo, Chiariotti PaoloORCID, Simoni Serena, Montalto LuigiORCID, Baleani Alessia, Paone NicolaORCID
Abstract
The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic brought about a broader use of masks by both professionals and the general population. This resulted in a severe worldwide shortage of devices and the need to increase import and activate production of safe and effective surgical masks at the national level. In order to support the demand for testing surgical masks in the Italian context, Universities provided their contribution by setting up laboratories for testing mask performance before releasing products into the national market. This paper reports the effort of seven Italian university laboratories who set up facilities for testing face masks during the emergency period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Measurement set-ups were built, adapting the methods specified in the EN 14683:2019+AC. Data on differential pressure (DP) and bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) of 120 masks, including different materials and designs, were collected over three months. More than 60% of the masks satisfied requirements for DP and BFE set by the standard. Masks made of nonwoven polypropylene with at least three layers (spunbonded–meltblown–spunbonded) showed the best results, ensuring both good breathability and high filtration efficiency. The majority of the masks created with alternative materials and designs did not comply with both standard requirements, resulting in suitability only as community masks. The effective partnering between universities and industries to meet a public need in an emergency context represented a fruitful example of the so-called university “third-mission”.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference35 articles.
1. Advice on the Use of Masks in the Community, during Home Care and in Healthcare Settings in the Context of the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreak
https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/advice-on-the-use-of-masks-in-the-community-during-home-care-and-in-healthcare-settings-in-the-context-of-the-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)-outbreak 2. CEN Workshop Agreement CWA 17553:2020 E, “Community Face Coverings—Guide to Minimum Requirements, Methods of Testing and Use”,2020 3. Decreto Legge n.9 Del 2 Marzo 2020 (Art. 34, Comma 3),2020 4. Decreto Legge Del 17 Marzo 2020 n.18 (Art. 15),2020
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|