Author:
Chiera Silvia,Bosco Francesca,Mollea Chiara,Piscitello Amelia,Sethi Rajandrea,Nollo Giandomenico,Caola Iole,Tessarolo Francesco
Abstract
AbstractFace masks play a role in reducing the spread of airborne pathogens, providing that they have a good filtration performance, are correctly fitted and maintained. Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (BFE) is a key indicator for evaluating filtration performance according to both European and US standards, requiring the use of Staphylococcus aureus loaded aerosol. However, the generation and handling of a Biohazard group 2 bacterium aerosol require a careful management of the biological risk and pose limitations to the accessibility to this method. To mitigate these drawbacks, we investigated the use of S. epidermidis ATCC 12228, a Biohazard group 1 bacterium, as surrogate in BFE test. To this end, tests with the surrogate strain were performed to tune the method. Then, three face mask models, representative for both surgical and community masks, were tested according to the standard method and then using an aerosolized suspension of S. epidermidis. BFE% values were calculated for each mask model and tested microorganisms. Results showed that BFE test can be performed using the S. epidermidis instead of S. aureus, preserving results validity and turnaround time, but reducing residual risk for laboratory operators.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. European Committee for Standardization, EN 14683:2019+AC:2019. Medical Face Masks—Requirements and Test Methods (2019).
2. ASTM International-ASTM F2101-19. Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Bacterial Filtration Efficiency (BFE) of Medical Face Mask Materials, Using a Biological Aerosol of Staphylococcus aureus | Engineering360. https://standards.globalspec.com/std/13404922/astm-f2101-19. Accessed 29 Nov 2021.
3. Laboratory Biosafety Manual, 4th ed. https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240011311. Accessed 12 Jul 2023 (2023).
4. Busta, F. et al. The use of indicators and surrogate microorganisms for the evaluation of pathogens in fresh and fresh-cut produce. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2003.tb00035.x (2003).
5. Becker, K., Heilmann, C. & Peters, G. Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 27, 870–926. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00109-13 (2014).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献