Affiliation:
1. Construction Engineering and Management, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
Abstract
This paper aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis and traditional literature review concerning collaborative project delivery (CPD) methods, with an emphasis on design-build (DB), construction management at risk (CMAR), and integrated project delivery (PD) Methods. This article seeks to identify the most influential publications, reveal the advantages and disadvantages of CPD, and determine the most suitable CPD methods for sustainable construction. This research involves the application of bibliometric instruments in R, which is a powerful statistical computing language that can be used to perform complex data analyses and visualizations on bibliographic data to scrutinize academic journals retrieved from the Scopus database. Google Scholar is also utilized for an in-depth analysis as part of this study. Relevant articles are identified and screened for review. Our analysis is grounded on an extensive dataset of 927 journal articles collected from the year 2000 up to September 2023, providing a robust foundation for a comprehensive examination. Citation analysis identified highly cited publications that have significantly influenced the discourse on CPD. The analysis further established the advantages and disadvantages of CPD methods to suggest the most suitable CPD technique for sustainable construction. The results of this analysis offer insights into future directions and opportunities for further research through a comprehensive overview of the existing discourse on the subject. The paper classifies CPD through collaborative contracting, particularly through early contractor involvement (ECI), groups the design-build and construction manager at risk methods under CPD, and aligns their advantages with the critical success factors for sustainable construction in order to select the most suitable CPD technique. This research can serve as a guide for industry professionals, researchers, and policymakers, providing a structured path for collaborative endeavors and facilitating coordinated efforts toward collaborative project delivery methods and sustainable construction.
Reference159 articles.
1. Giachino, J., Cecil, M., Husselbee, B., and Matthews, C. (2016, January 24–26). Alternative Project Delivery: Construction Management at Risk, Design-Build and Public-Private Partnerships. Proceedings of the Utility Management Conference 2016, San Diego, CA, USA.
2. Performance of Design-Build and Construction Manager-at-Risk Methods in Water and Wastewater Projects;Shrestha;Pract. Period. Struct. Des. Constr.,2019
3. Lessons Learned in Design-Build and Construction-Manager-at-Risk Water and Wastewater Project;Shrestha;J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr.,2020
4. Identification of Selection Criteria for Operational Variations of The Design-Build System: A Delphi Study in China;Xia;J. Civ. Eng. Manag.,2012
5. Municipal Water/Wastewater Project Delivery Performance Comparison;Shane;J. Manag. Eng.,2013