Affiliation:
1. Michigan Technological University, Great Lakes Research Center, Contractor to the US Geological Survey, Houghton, MI 49931, USA
2. US Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA
Abstract
Mapping benthic habitats with bathymetric, acoustic, and spectral data requires georeferenced ground-truth information about habitat types and characteristics. New technologies like autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) collect tens of thousands of images per mission making image-based ground truthing particularly attractive. Two types of machine learning (ML) models, random forest (RF) and deep neural network (DNN), were tested to determine whether ML models could serve as an accurate substitute for manual classification of AUV images for substrate type interpretation. RF models were trained to predict substrate class as a function of texture, edge, and intensity metrics (i.e., features) calculated for each image. Models were tested using a manually classified image dataset with 9-, 6-, and 2-class schemes based on the Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard (CMECS). Results suggest that both RF and DNN models achieve comparable accuracies, with the 9-class models being least accurate (~73–78%) and the 2-class models being the most accurate (~95–96%). However, the DNN models were more efficient to train and apply because they did not require feature estimation before training or classification. Integrating ML models into benthic habitat mapping process can improve our ability to efficiently and accurately ground-truth large areas of benthic habitat using AUV or similar images.
Funder
Great Lakes Restoration Initiative
Reference54 articles.
1. Valentine, P.C. (2019). Sediment Classification and the Characterization, Identification, and Mapping of Geologic Substrates for the Glaciated Gulf of Maine Seabed and Other Terrains, Providing a Physical Framework for Ecological Research and Seabed Management, U.S. Geological Survey. Scientific Investigations Report.
2. Gibbs, A.G., and Cochrane, S.A. (2009). Remote Sensing and Geospatial Technologies for Coastal Ecosystem Assessment and Management, Springer. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography.
3. Do Marine Substrates ‘Look’ and ‘Sound’ the Same? Supervised Classification of Multibeam Acoustic Data Using Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Images;Lucieer;Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci.,2013
4. Montereale Gavazzi, G., Kapasakali, D.A., Kerchof, F., Deleu, S., Degraer, S., and Van Lancker, V. (2021). Subtidal Natural Hard Substrate Quantitative Habitat Mapping: Interlinking Underwater Acoustics and Optical Imagery with Machine Learning. Remote Sens., 13.
5. Reif, M.K., Krumwiede, B.S., Brown, S.E., Theuerkauf, E.J., and Harwood, J.H. (2021). Nearshore Benthic Mapping in the Great Lakes: A Multi-Agency Data Integration Approach in Southwest Lake Michigan. Remote Sens., 13.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献