Beyond Patient Characteristics: A Narrative Review of Contextual Factors Influencing Involuntary Admissions in Mental Health Care

Author:

Aluh Deborah Oyine123ORCID,Aigbogun Osaro4ORCID,Ukoha-Kalu Blessing Onyinye5ORCID,Silva Manuela12,Grigaitė Ugnė12ORCID,Pedrosa Barbara12,Santos-Dias Margarida12,Cardoso Graça12,Caldas-de-Almeida José Miguel12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health (LIGMH), NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon, 1150-082 Lisboa, Portugal

2. Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), NOVA Medical School, NOVA University of Lisbon, 1150-082 Lisboa, Portugal

3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nsukka 410105, Nigeria

4. Department of Management, Marketing and Digital Business, Curtin University, Miri 98009, Malaysia

5. School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

Abstract

Variations in the rates of involuntary admission (IA) reflect the influence of unexplained contextual variables that are typically too heterogeneous to be included in systematic reviews. This paper attempts to gather and analyze factors unrelated to the patients that have been linked to IA. The articles included in this review were selected by iteratively searching four electronic databases (PubMed, PsychINFO, EMBASE, and Web of Science). A total of 54 studies from 19 different countries and regions, including 14 European countries, the United States, Canada, China, Vietnam, and Taiwan, were selected. The factors were categorized as service-related factors, impactful events, seasonal and temporal factors, mental health legislation, staff factors, and public attitudes. The factors rarely act in isolation but rather interact and reinforce each other, causing a greater influence on IA. This paper explains how these factors present opportunities for robust and sustainable interventions to reduce IAs. The paper also identifies future directions for research, such as examining the effects of economic recessions. Enhancing global reporting standards is essential to validate future research and support further in-depth studies. The complexity of the factors influencing IA and the implicit role of society suggest that resolving it will require social change.

Funder

“la Caixa” Foundation

FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference101 articles.

1. Compulsory Interventions Are Challenging the Identity of Psychiatry;Hoff;Front. Psychiatry,2019

2. Involuntary vs. voluntary hospital admission. A systematic literature review on outcome diversity;Kallert;Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci.,2008

3. The relationship between the use of mental health act and general population suicide rates in England and Wales;Shah;J. Inj. Violence Res.,2012

4. Effects of seclusion and restraint in adult psychiatry: A systematic review;Chieze;Front. Psychiatry,2019

5. Advance Directive in End of Life Decision-Making among the Yoruba of South-Western Nigeria;Jegede;BEOnline J. West Afr. Bioeth. Train. Program,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3