Exploring pathways to compulsory detention in psychiatric hospital and ways to prevent repeat detentions; Service user perspectives

Author:

Birken Mary,Kular Ariana,Nyikavaranda Patrick,Parkinson Jordan,Mitchell Lizzie,Fraser Kathleen Lindsay,White Valerie Christina,Seale Janet,Hardy Jackie,Stone Cady,Holden Mark Keith,Elliott Tyler,Li Zishi,Mbeah-Bankas Henrietta,Wood Lisa,Lobban Fiona,Lloyd-Evans Brynmor,Johnson SoniaORCID

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThis study, co-produced by a team of academics, lived experience researchers and clinicians, explores the views and experiences of people who have been compulsorily detained in hospital under the Mental Health Act (1983) (MHA) in England, to understand how and why, from their perspective, compulsory detentions occur, and what might help prevent them.MethodsSemi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 people (55% male, 40% Black/Black British, 30% White British) who had been compulsory detained in hospital within the past 5 years. Lived experience researchers with relevant personal experience carried out interviews via telephone or videoconference and participated in analysis of data via a template approach.ResultsWe derived three over-arching themes from interviews. The first theme “Individual factors increasing or reducing likelihood of being detained” encompassed factors related to people’s own lives and attitudes, including life stressors, not taking medication, the risk individuals may pose to themselves or others, and their attitude to and management of their mental health. The second theme “Family and Support Network” reflects how attitudes and support from family, friends and support network may contribute to compulsory detentions or support people to stay well. The third theme “Need for improvement in Service Responses” identified limitations of services that contribute to detention, including lack of collaborative care and choice, poor quality of professional support, and discriminatory attitudes from staff. Each theme also included potential approaches to addressing these limitations and reducing compulsory detentions.ConclusionFindings suggest multiple interacting factors may lead to people being detained in hospital under the MHA, and that improvements to services, such as increasing collaborative care and service user-led family involvement, could prevent further detentions.

Publisher

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

Reference36 articles.

1. NHS Digital (2022a) Mental Health Act Statistics, Annual Figures, 2021-22. Retrieved 26 January 2023, from https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/mental-health-act-statistics-annual-figures/2021-22-annual-figures

2. Variations in patterns of involuntary hospitalisation and in legal frameworks: an international comparative study

3. Patients' experiences of assessment and detention under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

4. Carers' experiences of involuntary admission under mental health legislation: systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3