Failure in Medical Practice: Human Error, System Failure, or Case Severity?

Author:

Roman Mihai DanORCID,Fleacă Sorin RaduORCID,Boicean Adrian Gheorghe,Mohor Cosmin Ioan,Morar Silviu,Dura Horatiu,Cristian Adrian Nicolae,Bratu Dan,Tanasescu Ciprian,Teodoru Adrian,Necula Radu,Russu Octav

Abstract

The success rate in medical practice will probably never reach 100%. Success rates depend on many factors. Defining the success rate is both a technical and a philosophical issue. In opposition to the concept of success, medical failure should also be discussed. Its causality is multifactorial and extremely complex. Its actual rate and its real impact are unknown. In medical practice, failure depends not only on the human factor but also on the medical system and has at its center a very important variable—the patient. To combat errors, capturing, tracking, and analyzing them at an institutional level are important. Barriers such as the fear of consequences or a specific work climate or culture can affect this process. Although important data regarding medical errors and their consequences can be extracted by analyzing patient outcomes or using quality indicators, patient stories (clinical cases) seem to have the greatest impact on our subconscious as medical doctors and nurses and these may generate the corresponding and necessary reactions. Every clinical case has its own story. In this study, three different cases are presented to illustrate how human error, the limits of the system, and the particularities of the patient’s condition (severity of the disease), alone or in combination, may lead to tragic outcomes There is a need to talk openly and in a balanced way about failure, regardless of its cause, to look at things as they are, without hiding the inconvenient truth. The common goal is not to find culprits but to find solutions and create a culture of safety.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference32 articles.

1. Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals;Gawande;Surgery,2003

2. Rodziewicz, T.L., Houseman, B., and Hipskind, J.E. (2022). Medical Error Reduction, and Prevention, StatPearls Publishing.

3. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Romanian Oxford Shoulder Score. Medicine (Baltimore);Haragus;Medicine,2018

4. Learning from failure in health care: Frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers;Edmondson;BMJ Qual. Saf.,2004

5. Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups;Cannon;J. Organ. Behav.,2001

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3