Experiencing (Shared) Decision Making: Results from a Qualitative Study of People with Mental Illness and Their Family Members

Author:

Schladitz Katja1ORCID,Weitzel Elena C.1ORCID,Löbner Margrit1ORCID,Soltmann Bettina2ORCID,Jessen Frank3,Pfennig Andrea2ORCID,Riedel-Heller Steffi G.1ORCID,Gühne Uta1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, 04103 Leipzig, Germany

2. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany

3. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Köln, Germany

Abstract

(1) Background: There is a fundamental shift in healthcare toward shared decision making (SDM). This study explores SDM from the perspective of individuals affected by mental illness and their family members and investigates factors which promote and hinder the process. (2) Methods: We conducted N = 15 telephone interviews (n = 4 adults affected by mental illness, n = 5 family members, n = 6 both applicable, the majority reporting experiences with affective and anxiety disorders). Data were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed according to procedures established by Mayring. (3) Results: Individuals affected by mental illness and their family members have a strong desire to be involved in treatment decisions and to participate in finding a diagnosis. Often these stakeholders are denied the opportunity to participate; sometimes enabling behaviors impede participation. The stigmatization of mental illnesses is a major barrier. There are also structural barriers to SDM within the healthcare system. Peer support, self-help associations, and psychosocial counseling services are important to empowering individuals and promoting SDM. (4) Conclusions: SDM has the potential to improve the quality of mental healthcare. Barriers can be mitigated and new approaches for interventions in the psychiatric sector have been identified. This study has also shown the importance of understanding SDM as a process that should begin at the diagnostic phase.

Funder

Joint Federal Committee

German Federal Ministry for Education and Research

Open Access Publishing Fund of Leipzig University

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference96 articles.

1. The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship;Kaba;Int. J. Surg.,2007

2. Patient participation in mental health care–Perspectives of healthcare professionals: An integrative review;Rendtorff;Scand. J. Caring Sci.,2018

3. Engaging patients in decision-making and behavior change to promote prevention;Krist;Stud. Health Technol. Inform.,2017

4. Conceptual understanding and applicability of shared decision-making in psychiatric care: An integrative review;Gurtner;J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs.,2021

5. Partizipative Entscheidungsfindung (PEF)–Patient und Arzt als Team;Bieber;Rehabilitation,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Users remain overlooked: Shared decision‐making processes for people with anxiety disorders;Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing;2024-08-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3