A Potential Indicator for Assessing Patient Blood Management Standard Implementation

Author:

Kazamer Andrea12,Ilinca Radu3,Vesa Stefan2,Lorenzovici Laszlo4ORCID,Stanescu-Spinu Iulia-Ioana5,Ganea Ionela6,Greabu Maria5,Miricescu Daniela5,Biczo Andras7,Ionescu Daniela28ORCID

Affiliation:

1. CREST Association, 48 Alexandru Odobescu Street, 440069 Satu Mare, Romania

2. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care I, Faculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Victor Babes Street, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

3. Discipline of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Faculty of Dentistry, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 4-6 Eforie Street, 050037 Bucharest, Romania

4. Faculty of Technical and Human Sciences, Sapientia Hungarian University of Transylvania, 4 Matei Corvin Street, 400112 Cluj-Napoca, Romania

5. Discipline of Biochemistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Eroii Sanitari Street, 050474 Bucharest, Romania

6. Department of Modern Languages, Faculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 8 Eroii Sanitari Street, 050474 Bucharest, Romania

7. Department Hamm 2 Manufacturing and Production Technology, Hamm-Lippstadt University of Applied Sciences, Allee 76-78, D-59063 Hamm, Germany

8. Outcome Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA

Abstract

(1) Background: Patient blood management (PBM) program as a multidisciplinary practice and a standard of care for the anemic surgical patient has an increasingly important role in reducing transfusions and optimizing both clinical outcomes and costs. Documented success of PBM implementation is not sufficient for implementation of recommendations and correct use at hospital level. The primary objective of our study was to define a composite patient blood management process safety index—Safety Index in PBM (SIPBM)—that measures the impact of screening and treating anemic patients on the efficiency and effectiveness of the patient care process undergoing elective surgery. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative study in a tertiary hospital by collecting data and analyzing the Safety Index in PBM (SIPBM) in patients undergoing major elective surgical procedures. (3) Results: The percentage of patients from the total of 354 patients (178 in 2019 and 176 in 2022) included in the study who benefited from preoperative iron treatment increased in 2022 compared to 2019 from 27.40% to 36.71%. The median value of the SIPBM was 1.00 in both periods analyzed, although there is a significant difference between the two periods (p < 0.005), in favor of 2022. (4) Conclusions: Measuring the effectiveness of PBM implementation and providing ongoing feedback through the Safety Index in PBM (SIPBM) increases the degree to which opportunities to improve the PBM process are identified. The study represents a first step for future actions and baselines to develop tools to measure the safety and impact of the patient blood management process in the surgical field.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Health Information Management,Health Informatics,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference43 articles.

1. Hussein, M., Pavlova, M., Ghalwash, M., and Groot, W. (2021). The impact of hospital accreditation on the quality of healthcare: A systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv. Res., 21.

2. Donaldson, M.S., Corrigan, J.M., and Kohn, L.T. (2000). To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System, National Academies Press.

3. Patient safety culture in intensive care units: Perspective of health professionals;Souza;Rev. Gaúcha Enferm.,2019

4. Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: Diversity in recommendations and future directions;Waltz;Implement. Sci.,2019

5. McKinsey global results: Creating organizational transformations;Meaney;McKinsey Q.,2008

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3