Comparative Analysis of Therapeutic Showers and Bathtubs for Pain Management and Labor Outcomes—A Retrospective Cohort Study

Author:

Mellado-García Elena1ORCID,Díaz-Rodríguez Lourdes1ORCID,Cortés-Martín Jonathan1ORCID,Sánchez-García Juan Carlos1ORCID,Piqueras-Sola Beatriz2,Macías Juan Carlos Higuero3,Rivas Ruiz Francisco3ORCID,Rodríguez-Blanque Raquel14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain

2. Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, 18014 Granada, Spain

3. Costa del Sol University Hospital, 29603 Marbella, Spain

4. San Cecilio University Hospital, 18016 Granada, Spain

Abstract

Hydrotherapy, including the use of therapeutic showers and bathtubs, has been studied for its potential benefits in labor pain management. Previous research has indicated that hydrotherapy can alleviate pain, but comparative studies between therapeutic showers and bathtubs are scarce. Objective: This study aims to compare the effects of therapeutic showers and bathtubs on pain perception, labor duration, use of epidural analgesia, and maternal and neonatal outcomes during labor. Methods: A total of 124 pregnant women were included in this study. Participants were divided into two groups: those who used a therapeutic shower and those who used a bathtub during labor. Pain levels were measured using a visual analog scale (VAS). Labor duration, use of epidural analgesia, types of delivery, maternal outcomes (postpartum hemorrhage, perineal status, maternal hypotension, fever, and breastfeeding), and neonatal outcomes (APGAR scores, fetal heart rate, complications, and neonatal unit admissions) were recorded and analyzed. Results: Both the therapeutic shower and the bathtub effectively reduced pain perception, with the bathtub showing a greater reduction in VAS scores. The therapeutic shower group experienced a significantly shorter labor duration compared to the bathtub group. The majority of participants in both groups did not require epidural analgesia, with no significant differences between the groups. There were no significant differences in the types of delivery. Maternal outcomes indicated a lower incidence of perineal tears and episiotomies in the therapeutic shower group. Neonatal outcomes, including APGAR scores and fetal heart rate, were similar between the groups, with no significant differences in complications or neonatal unit admissions. Conclusions: Both therapeutic showers and bathtubs are effective for pain relief during labor, with the bathtub showing a higher reduction in pain intensity. The therapeutic shower is associated with a shorter labor duration and a lower incidence of perineal tears and episiotomies. Both methods are safe for neonatal well-being, making hydrotherapy a viable non-pharmacological option for pain management in labor. However, the therapeutic shower may offer additional benefits in terms of labor duration and maternal outcomes.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference18 articles.

1. Immersion in Water during Labour and Birth;Cluett;Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.,2018

2. (2009). Benko A Waterbirth: Is It a Real Choise. Midwifery Matters, 122, 9–12.

3. Non-Invasive Nursing Technologies for Pain Relief during Childbirth—The Brazilian Nurse Midwives’ View;Vargens;Midwifery,2013

4. “After Having a Waterbirth, I Feel like It’s the Only Way People Should Deliver Babies”: The Decision Making Process of Women Who Plan a Waterbirth;Fair;Midwifery,2020

5. Reviriego Rodrigo, E., Ibargoyen-Roteta, N., Carreguí Vilar, S., Mediavilla Serrano, L., Montero Carcaboso, S., Ares Mateos, G., Castelló Zamora, B., Moreno Rodríguez, A., Hernández Tejada, N., and Koetsenruyter, C. (Inmersión En Agua Durante El Parto. Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias, 2022). Inmersión En Agua Durante El Parto. Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3