Author:
Friesen Deanna C.,Frid Bailey
Abstract
The current study investigated the type of strategies that English–French bilingual adults utilize when reading in their dominant and non-dominant languages and which of these strategies are associated with reading comprehension success. Thirty-nine participants read short texts while reporting aloud what they were thinking as they read. Following each passage, readers answered three comprehension questions. Questions either required information found directly in the text (literal question) or required a necessary inference or an elaborative inference. Readers reported more necessary and elaborative inferences and referred to more background knowledge in their dominant language than in their non-dominant language. Engaging in both text analysis strategies and meaning extraction strategies predicted reading comprehension success in both languages, with differences observed depending on the type of question posed. Results are discussed with respect to how strategy use supports the development of text representations.
Funder
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
The University of Western Ontario
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference73 articles.
1. Literacy attainment in a second language submersion context
2. Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12
3. Taxonomies in L1 and L2 reading strategies: A critical review of issues surrounding strategy-use definitions and classifications in previous think-aloud research;Alkhaleefah;The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal,2016
4. Saudi EFL Learners’ Reported Reading Problems and Strategic Processing of Text Types: A Think-aloud Case Study
5. Introduction to Measurement Theory;Allen,1979
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献