Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Genomic Healthcare Utilization, Patient Activation, and Intrafamilial Communication of Risk among Females Tested for BRCA Variants: A Mixed Methods Study

Author:

Hesse-Biber Sharlene1ORCID,Seven Memnun2,Shea Hannah1,Heaney Madeline1,Dwyer Andrew A.34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA

2. Elaine Marieb College of Nursing, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA

3. William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA

4. Harvard Center for Reproductive Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA

Abstract

This study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of genomic healthcare utilization, patient activation, and intrafamilial risk communication among racially and ethnically diverse individuals tested for BRCA variants. We employed an explanatory, sequential, mixed-methods study guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior. Participants completed an online survey, including sociodemographic, medical history, and several validated instruments. A subset of participants participated in in-depth, semi-structured interviews. A total of 242 women were included in the quantitative analyses. The majority of survey participants identified as non-Hispanic white (NHW) (n = 197, 81.4%) while 45/242 (18.5%) identified as black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC). The NHW participants were more likely to communicate genetic test results with healthcare providers, family, and friends than BIPOC participants (p < 0.05). BIPOC participants had lower satisfaction with testing decisions and significantly higher ratings of personal discrimination, fatalism, resilience, uncertainty, and lower patient activation scores (p < 0.05). Participants with higher education, greater satisfaction with testing decisions, and lower resilience are more likely to communicate BRCA test results with family members through the mediating effect of patient activation. Bridging disparities to ensure that genomic healthcare benefits all people may demand theory-driven, multi-level interventions targeting the individual, interpersonal, and healthcare system levels.

Funder

Boston College

National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Genetics (clinical),Genetics

Reference51 articles.

1. CancerDisparitiesProgressReport.org [Internet] (2022, December 02). Philadelphia: American Association for Cancer Research; ©2022 [11/10/2022]. Available online: http://www.CancerDisparitiesProgressReport.org/.

2. American Cancer Society (2023). Cancer Facts & Figures 2023, American Cancer Society. Available online: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2023/2023-cancer-facts-and-figures.pdf.

3. Racial disparities in BRCA testing and cancer risk management across a population-based sample of young breast cancer survivors;Cragun;Cancer,2017

4. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers;Kuchenbaecker;JAMA,2017

5. National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program (2022, November 05). Cancer Stat Facts, Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3