A Comparative Study on Crack Detection in Concrete Walls Using Transfer Learning Techniques

Author:

Philip Remya Elizabeth1ORCID,Andrushia A. Diana1,Nammalvar Anand2,Gurupatham Beulah Gnana Ananthi3ORCID,Roy Krishanu4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore 641114, India

2. Department of Civil Engineering, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, Coimbatore 641114, India

3. Division of Structural Engineering, College of Engineering Guindy Campus, Anna University, Chennai 600025, India

4. School of Engineering, The University of Waikato, Hamilton 3216, New Zealand

Abstract

Structural cracks have serious repercussions on the safety, adaptability, and longevity of structures. Therefore, assessing cracks is an important parameter when evaluating the quality of concrete construction. As numerous cutting-edge automated inspection systems that exploit cracks have been developed, the necessity for individual/personal onsite inspection has reduced exponentially. However, these methods need to be improved in terms of cost efficiency and accuracy. The deep-learning-based assessment approaches for structural systems have seen a significant development noticed by the structural health monitoring (SHM) community. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are vital in these deep learning methods. Technologies such as convolutional neural networks hold promise for precise and accurate condition evaluation. Moreover, transfer learning enables users to use CNNs without needing a comprehensive grasp of algorithms or the capability to modify pre-trained networks for particular purposes. Within the context of this study, a thorough analysis of well-known pre-trained networks for classifying the cracks in buildings made of concrete is conducted. The classification performance of convolutional neural network designs such as VGG16, VGG19, ResNet 50, MobileNet, and Xception is compared to one another with the concrete crack image dataset. It is identified that the ResNet50-based classifier provided accuracy scores of 99.91% for training and 99.88% for testing. Xception architecture delivered the least performance, with training and test accuracy of 99.64% and 98.82%, respectively.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Engineering (miscellaneous),Ceramics and Composites

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3