Affiliation:
1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Cumhuriyet, Sivas 58140, Türkiye
2. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Cumhuriyet, Sivas 58140, Türkiye
3. Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Osmangazi, Eskişehir 26040, Türkiye
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the physical properties of Cention N and various glass-ionomer-based materials in vitro. The groups were obtained as follows: Group 1 (LC-Cent): light-cured Cention N; Group 2 (SC-Cent): self-cured Cention N; Group 3 (COMP): composite (3M Universal Restorative 200); Group 4 (DYRA): compomer (Dyract XP); Group 5 (LINER): Glass Liner; Group 6 (FUJI): FujiII LC Capsule; and Group 7 (NOVA): Nova Glass LC. For the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) test, 21 extracted human molar teeth were used. The enamel of the teeth was removed, and flat dentin surfaces were obtained. Materials were applied up to 3 mm, and sticks were obtained from the teeth. Additionally, specimens were prepared, and their flexural strength and surface roughness (Ra) were evaluated. Herein, data were recorded using SPSS 22.0, and the flexural strength, μTBS, and Ra were statistically analyzed. According to the surface roughness tests, the highest Ra values were observed in Group 6 (FUJI) (0.33 ± 0.1), whereas the lowest Ra values were observed in Group 2 (SC-Cent) (0.17 ± 0.04) (p < 0.05). The flexural strengths of the materials were compared, and the highest value was obtained in Group 2 (SC-Cent) (86.32 ± 15.37), whereas the lowest value was obtained in Group 5 (LINER) (41.75 ± 10.05) (p < 0.05). When the μTBS of materials to teeth was evaluated, the highest μTBS was observed in Group 3 (COMP) (16.50 ± 7.73) and Group 4 (DYRA) (16.36 ± 4.64), whereas the lowest μTBS was found in Group 7 (NOVA) (9.88 ± 1.87) (p < 0.05). According to the μTBS results of materials-to-materials bonding, both Group 2 (SC-Cent) and Group 1 (LC-Cent) made the best bonding with Group 3 (COMP) (p < 0.05). It can be concluded that self-cured Cention N had the highest flexural strength and lowest surface roughness of the seven materials tested. Although the bond strength was statistically lower than conventional composites and compomers, it was similar to resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Additionally, the best material-to-material bonding was found between self-cured Cention N and conventional composites.
Funder
Scientific Research Project Fund Cumhuriyet University
Subject
Polymers and Plastics,General Chemistry
Reference31 articles.
1. Evaluation of compressive strength between Cention N and high copper amalgam-An in vitro study;Kumar;Drug Invent. Today,2019
2. Glass ionomer cements compared with composite resin in restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Bezerra;Heliyon,2020
3. Composite materials: Composition, properties and clinical applications. A literature review;Zimmerli;Schweiz. Mon. Zahnmed. Rev. Mens. Suisse D’odonto-Stomatol. Riv. Mens. Svizz. Odontol. Stomatol.,2010
4. Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite-An in vitro study;Hiremath;J. Conserv. Dent.,2022
5. Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Cention N with Conventionally used Restorative Materials—An In Vitro Study;Mishra;Int. J. Prosthodont. Restor. Dent.,2018
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献