The Impact of 10 Unmalted Alternative Adjuncts on Wort Characteristics
Author:
Laureys David1ORCID, Baillière Jeroen1, Vermeir Pieter2, Vanderputten Dana3, De Clippeleer Jessika13ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Innovation Centre for Brewing & Fermentation (IBF), Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Valentin Vaerwyckweg 1, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 2. Laboratory of Chemical Analysis (LCA), Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Valentin Vaerwyckweg 1, 9000 Ghent, Belgium 3. Innovation Centre for Brewing & Fermentation (IBF), AgroFoodNature, HOGENT University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Valentin Vaerwyckweg 1, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Abstract
Consumers are more than ever in search of novel and exciting beer choices, and brewers are, therefore, continuously experimenting to adapt their product portfolio. One interesting way to naturally incorporate novel flavors and tastes is by using alternative adjuncts, but this is not always an easy and straightforward process. In this study, a 40% unmalted alternative adjunct (einkorn, emmer, spelt, khorasan, quinoa, amaranth, buckwheat, sorghum, teff, and tritordeum) or reference (barley malt, unmalted barley, and unmalted wheat) was added to 60% barley malt, after which three different laboratory mashing processes (Congress mash, Congress mash with pre-gelatinization of the adjunct, and Evans mash) were performed, and their behavior during mashing and the resulting wort characteristics were investigated in detail. Overall, the extraction process of all 10 unmalted alternative adjuncts was not complete for all three laboratory mashing processes, whereby Congress mashing resulted in the highest extract and fastest filtration, whereas Evans mashing resulted in the lowest extract and slowest filtration. Pre-gelatinization of the unmalted was generally only beneficial for adjuncts with high onset starch gelatinization temperatures. This process also inactivated endogenous enzymes in the unmalted adjuncts, which had an adverse effect on the mashing process.
Funder
Vlaamse Agentschap voor Innoveren en Ondernemen
Subject
Plant Science,Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science),Microbiology,Food Science
Reference37 articles.
1. Europe now dominates craft beer innovation;Forsyth;Brew. Beverage Ind. Int.,2018 2. Zegler, J. (2022). The Future of Beer and Cider, Mintel. 3. Factors influencing the choice of beer: A review;Betancur;Food Res. Int.,2020 4. Garavaglia, C., and Swinnen, J. (2018). Economic Perspectives on Craft Beer, Palgrave Macmillan. 5. Villacreces, S., Blanco, C.A., and Caballero, I. (2022). Developments and characteristics of craft beer production processes. Food Biosci., 45.
|
|