Affiliation:
1. Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt, 85049 Ingolstadt, Germany
2. Johannes Kepler Universität, 4040 Linz, Austria
3. University of Duisburg-Essen, 45141 Essen, Germany
Abstract
Currently, a significant gap exists between academic and industrial research in automated driving development. Despite this, there is common sense that cooperative control approaches in automated vehicles will surpass the previously favored takeover paradigm in most driving situations due to enhanced driving performance and user experience. Yet, the application of these concepts in real driving situations remains unclear, and a holistic approach to driving cooperation is missing. Existing research has primarily focused on testing specific interaction scenarios and implementations. To address this gap and offer a contemporary perspective on designing human–vehicle cooperation in automated driving, we have developed a three-part taxonomy with the help of an extensive literature review. The taxonomy broadens the notion of driving cooperation towards a holistic and application-oriented view by encompassing (1) the “Cooperation Use Case”, (2) the “Cooperation Frame”, and (3) the “Human–Machine Interface”. We validate the taxonomy by categorizing related literature and providing a detailed analysis of an exemplar paper. The proposed taxonomy offers designers and researchers a concise overview of the current state of driver cooperation and insights for future work. Further, the taxonomy can guide automotive HMI designers in ideation, communication, comparison, and reflection of cooperative driving interfaces.
Funder
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs, Regional Development and Energy
Reference99 articles.
1. (2021). Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles (Standard No. Ground Vehicle Standard J3016_202104).
2. Walch, M., Sieber, T., Hock, P., Baumann, M., and Weber, M. (2016, January 24–26). Towards Cooperative Driving: Involving the Driver in an Autonomous Vehicle’s Decision Making. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, New York, NY, USA.
3. Resurrecting the ghost in the shell: A need-centered development approach for optimizing user experience in highly automated vehicles;Frison;Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav.,2019
4. How to Increase Automated Vehicles’ Acceptance through In-Vehicle Interaction Design: A Review;Detjen;Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.,2021
5. Why drivers use in-vehicle technology: The role of basic psychological needs and motivation;Stiegemeier;Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav.,2024
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献