Affiliation:
1. Department of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Build Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Malaysia
2. Department of Aeronautical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Baghdad, Baghdad 10071, Iraq
3. Department of Mathematics, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece
Abstract
Widespread usage of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in new and emerging applications needs dynamic and adaptive networking. The development of routing protocols for UAV ad hoc networks faces numerous issues because of the unique characteristics of UAVs, such as rapid mobility, frequent changes in network topology, and limited energy consumption. The Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) protocol seems to be a promising solution as it offers improved delay performance. It is expected that OLSR will satisfy the strict demands of real-time UAV applications such as “search and rescue” (SAR) missions as it involves the most recent update of routing information. The classical OLSR routing protocol and its enhanced versions, D-OLSR, ML-OLSR, and P-OLSR, use different techniques to make an appropriate decision for routing packets. These routing techniques consider the quality of a wireless link, type of antenna, load, and mobility-aware mechanism to select the best UAV to send the message to the destination. This study evaluates and examines the performance of the original and modified OLSR routing protocols in UAV ad hoc networks for three SAR scenarios: (1) increasing mobility, (2) increasing scalability, and (3) increasing the allowed space of UAVs. It analyzes and validates the performance of the four OLSR-based routing protocols. It determines the best OSLR routing protocol by taking into account the packet delivery ratio, latency, energy consumption, and throughput. The four routing protocols and the SAR scenarios were simulated using NS-3.32. Based on the simulation results, ML-OLSR outperforms OLSR, D-OLSR, and P-OLSR in the considered measures.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Computer Networks and Communications,Hardware and Architecture,Signal Processing,Control and Systems Engineering
Reference40 articles.
1. Survey of important issues in UAV communication networks;Gupta;IEEE Commun. Surv. Tut.,2015
2. Wheeb, A.H., Nordin, R., Samah, A.A., Alsharif, M.H., and Khan, M.A. (2022). Topology-based routing protocols and mobility models for flying ad hoc networks: A contemporary review and future research directions. Drones, 6.
3. A comprehensive survey in towards to future FANETs;IEEE Lat. Am. Trans.,2018
4. Flying ad hoc networks (FANET): Performance evaluation of topology based routing protocols;Wheeb;Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol.,2022
5. Jamming-resilient multipath routing protocol for flying ad hoc networks;Pu;IEEE Access,2018
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献