Estimations of Crop Losses Due to Flood Using Multiple Sources of Information and Models: The Case Study of the Panaro River

Author:

Monteleone Beatrice1,Giusti Riccardo1,Magnini Andrea2,Arosio Marcello1ORCID,Domeneghetti Alessio2ORCID,Borzì Iolanda3ORCID,Petruccelli Natasha2,Castellarin Attilio2ORCID,Bonaccorso Brunella3ORCID,Martina Mario L. V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sciences, Technologies and Society, University School for Advanced Studies of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy

2. Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering (DICAM), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy

3. Department of Engineering, University of Messina, Villaggio Sant’Agata, 98166 Messina, Italy

Abstract

Floods and droughts are the events that most threaten crop production; however, the impact of floods on crops is still not fully understood and often under-reported. Nowadays, multiple sources of information and approaches support the estimation of agricultural losses due to floods. This study aims to understand the differences in agricultural loss estimates provided by two conceptually different approaches (crop models and expert-based models), evaluating their sensitivity to flood hazard inputs. We investigated the challenges in flood agricultural loss assessments referring to a case study for which, in addition to model simulations, information from surveys and on-site inspections were available. Two crop models (APSIM and WOFOST) and the expert-based model AGRIDE-c were applied to evaluate agricultural yield losses after the flood event of the Panaro River (Emilia-Romagna, Northern Italy) that took place on the 6 December 2020. Two modelling tools were used to reproduce the event: the hydraulic model HEC-RAS and the image-based tool FwDET. Additionally, surveys among local farmers were conducted in the aftermath of the event to evaluate the flood features (water depth, extent and duration) and crop losses. The main findings of the study are that APSIM and WOFOST provide similar estimates of yield losses, while AGRIDE-c tends to underestimate yield losses when the losses over the entire study area are evaluated. The choice of the flood simulation technique does not influence the loss estimation since the difference between the yield loss estimates retrieved from the same model initialized with HEC-RAS or FwDET was always lower than 2%. Information retrieved from the surveys was not sufficient to validate the damage estimates provided by the models but could be used to derive a qualitative picture of the event. Therefore, further research is needed to understand how to effectively incorporate this kind of information in agricultural loss estimation.

Funder

Italian Ministry for Education

Regione Lombardia

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry

Reference77 articles.

1. FAO (2021). The Impact of Disasters and Crises on Agriculture and Food Security: 2021, FAO. Technical Report.

2. FAO (2015). Impact of Natural Hazards and Disasters on Agriculture and Food Security and Nutrition, FAO. Technical Report.

3. Review article “assessment of economic flood damage”;Merz;Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.,2010

4. Review Article: Economic evaluation of flood damage to agriculture—Review and analysis of existing methods;Grelot;Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.,2013

5. Influence of extreme weather disasters on global crop production;Lesk;Nature,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3