Abstract
Although disaster research has acknowledged the role of social media in crisis communication, the interplay of new (e.g., mobile apps) and traditional media (e.g., TV, radio) in public warnings has received less attention, particularly from the recipients’ perspective. Therefore, we examined sociodemographic and psychosocial correlates of different types of media use (i.e., traditional, new, mixed) for receiving public warning messages in a population survey (N = 613, 63% female; Mage = 31.56 years). More than two-thirds (68%) reported mixed media use, with 20% relying on new media and 12% on traditional media. Traditional media users were older and reported lower levels of education, while new media users were significantly younger and reported lower trust toward traditional media (i.e., TV). Migrants were more likely to use new but not mixed media. In sum, most participants utilized a mixture of traditional and new media for warning purposes, which has implications for crisis communication. Though, vulnerable populations (e.g., older and less educated participants) mainly rely on traditional media, stressing the need for continued support. Thus, it is paramount to increasingly use mixed methods designs and concurrently examine multiple channels to reflect real-world warning practices and generate ecologically valid results.
Funder
Federal Office of Civil protection and Disaster Assistance
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference55 articles.
1. Best Practices in Crisis Communication: An Expert Panel Process
2. CERC as a Theoretical Framework for Research and Practice
3. Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World;Renn,2008
4. Anforderungen und technische Konzepte der Krisenkommunikation bei Stromausfall [Requirements and technical concepts of crisis communication in case of a blackout];Reuter,2013
5. Communicating the Emergency: Preliminary findings on the elements of an effective public warning message;Kuligowski,2011