Influences of Personal Driving Styles and Experienced System Characteristics on Driving Style Preferences in Automated Driving
-
Published:2023-07-31
Issue:15
Volume:13
Page:8855
-
ISSN:2076-3417
-
Container-title:Applied Sciences
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Applied Sciences
Author:
Vasile Laurin1, Seitz Barbara1, Staab Verena2ORCID, Liebherr Magnus2ORCID, Däsch Christoph1, Schramm Dieter2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Automated Driving Systems, Mercedes-Benz AG, 70372 Stuttgart, Germany 2. Institute for Mechatronics, University Duisburg-Essen, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
Abstract
As automated driving technology continues to advance, the question of how users prefer to be driven in their new, more passive role is becoming increasingly relevant. In this paper, a real-world study on a German motorway with 42 participants was conducted to analyze driving style preferences for conditional automated driving, taking the participants’ personal driving style into account. In the first part, participants’ personal driving style (PDS) was recorded during a manual drive in the first half on a given route. For the second half, participants were asked to demonstrate their desired driving style (DDS) for conditional automated driving. In the second part, participants were driven on the same route in a defensive automated vehicle (AV) while rating driving comfort and safety. Subsequently, the relationship between driving style differences and ratings was analyzed. Furthermore, a comparison between PDS and DDS was performed. The results show that very defensive to moderate drivers perceived the AV’s driving style, being similar to their own, as equally safe but significantly more comfortable than moderate to very aggressive drivers. No influence of driving style differences was found on the increase in trust. However, a significant increase in trust after experiencing an automated vehicle has been observed. Furthermore, the rated system characteristics of anthropomorphism, safety, and overall driving strategy had a significant influence on driving style preferences for AVs. This study makes an important contribution to answering the question of how users want to be driven in conditional automated driving.
Funder
Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Duisburg-Essen
Subject
Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science
Reference81 articles.
1. SAE International (2021). SAE J3016: Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles, SAE. 2. Schramm, D., and Schweig, S. (2020). Altersgerechte Fahrerassistenzsysteme: Technische, Psychologische und Betriebswirtschaftliche Aspekte, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. 3. Hartwich, F., Beggiato, M., Dettman, A., and Krems, J. (2015, January 10–11). Drive me comfortable—Customized automated driving styles for younger and older drivers. Proceedings of the 8. VDI-Tagung “Der Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert”, Braunschweig, Germany. 4. In the passenger seat: Investigating ride comfort measures in autonomous cars;Elbanhawi;IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag.,2015 5. Peng, C., Merat, N., Romano, R., Hajiseyedjavadi, F., Paschalidis, E., Wei, C., Radhakrishnan, V., Solernou, A., Forster, D., and Boer, E. (Hum. Factors, 2022). Drivers’ Evaluation of Different Automated Driving Styles: Is It both Comfortable and Natural?, Hum. Factors, online first.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|