Affiliation:
1. Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia
Abstract
While the history and technology of cinema are considered for the purpose of achieving decolonial ends, this paper suggests that ‘classic’ cinema may be considered a quintessentially settler colonial medium. However, the moving image is now delivered in new ways and through new devices, and streaming has transformed global patterns of cinema production and consumption. Thus, two developments are considered in relation to this transformation. On the one hand, there are signs that mainstream cinema may be genuinely addressing its implication with colonialism, and this paper focuses on a formal apology and on a big budget movie that adopted a radically innovative approach to representing Indigenous peoples: Prey (2022). On the other hand, streaming has made cinema portable and has made consumption in personally deliberated instalments possible. The ‘digital natives’ consume cinema in fragmented and noncollective patterns, and their activity is subjected to unprecedented modalities of surveillance and appropriation. This paper concludes that a form of digital colonialism supported by streaming operates in ways that are homologous with modes of settler colonial appropriation.
Reference65 articles.
1. Aleiss, Angela (2005). Making the White Man’s Indian: Native Americans and Hollywood Movies, Praeger Publishers.
2. Land-Based Art Criticism: (Un)learning Land Through Art;Visual Arts Research,2021
3. Bataille, Gretchen M., and Silet, Charles L. P. (1980). The Pretend Indians: Images of Native Americans in the Movies, Iowa State University Press.
4. Closing the immigration-Aboriginal parallax gap;Bauder;Geoforum,2011
5. Belich, James (2009). Replenishing the Earth, Oxford University Press.